On 14/11/2020 21:53, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Dan]
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 10:10:48PM +, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King
>>
>> The shift of 1 by align_order is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic
>> and the result is assigned to a resource_size_t type variable that
>> is a 64
[+cc Dan]
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 10:10:48PM +, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> The shift of 1 by align_order is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic
> and the result is assigned to a resource_size_t type variable that
> is a 64 bit unsigned integer on 64 bit platforms. Fix an
On 2020-11-10 3:10 p.m., Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> The shift of 1 by align_order is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic
> and the result is assigned to a resource_size_t type variable that
> is a 64 bit unsigned integer on 64 bit platforms. Fix an overflow
> before widening
From: Colin Ian King
The shift of 1 by align_order is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic
and the result is assigned to a resource_size_t type variable that
is a 64 bit unsigned integer on 64 bit platforms. Fix an overflow
before widening issue by making the 1 a ULL.
Addresses-Coverity:
4 matches
Mail list logo