On 2/11/19 3:03 AM, nicolas.fe...@microchip.com wrote:
> On 08/02/2019 at 19:44, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Notice that, in this particular case, the /* fall through */
>>
On 08/02/2019 at 19:44, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, the /* fall through */
> comments are placed at the bottom of the case statement, which
>
On 02/08/2019 09:55 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Notice that, in this particular case, the /* fall through */
>> comments are placed at the bottom of the case statement, which
>>
Hello!
On 02/08/2019 09:44 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, the /* fall through */
> comments are placed at the bottom of the case statement,
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that, in this particular case, the /* fall through */
comments are placed at the bottom of the case statement, which
is what GCC is expecting to find.
Warning level 3 was used:
5 matches
Mail list logo