On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Coverity complains about a use after free for 'res1' and 'res2' since
> we use the value of the pointers in a 'dev_dbg()' after they have been
> freed. That's not really a problem, but it still seems cleaner to
> defer freeing until we are completely done
Coverity complains about a use after free for 'res1' and 'res2' since
we use the value of the pointers in a 'dev_dbg()' after they have been
freed. That's not really a problem, but it still seems cleaner to
defer freeing until we are completely done with the pointers.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
Coverity complains about a use after free for 'res1' and 'res2' since
we use the value of the pointers in a 'dev_dbg()' after they have been
freed. That's not really a problem, but it still seems cleaner to
defer freeing until we are completely done with the pointers.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Jesper Juhl wrote:
Coverity complains about a use after free for 'res1' and 'res2' since
we use the value of the pointers in a 'dev_dbg()' after they have been
freed. That's not really a problem, but it still seems cleaner to
defer freeing until we are completely done
4 matches
Mail list logo