On Mon, 21 Mar, at 01:43:18PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> OK, this is fine by me.
>
> Matt, what do you think?
If possible I'd like to see some mention in the commit message of
future Intel Base-IA platforms requiring this support, so when someone
asks me in the future (and I've forgotten the
On Mon, 21 Mar, at 01:43:18PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> OK, this is fine by me.
>
> Matt, what do you think?
If possible I'd like to see some mention in the commit message of
future Intel Base-IA platforms requiring this support, so when someone
asks me in the future (and I've forgotten the
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Chen Yu wrote:
> The problem is Linux registers pm_power_off = efi_power_off
> only if we are in hardware reduced mode. Actually, what we also
> want is to do this when ACPI S5 is simply not supported on
> non-legacy platforms. Since there
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Chen Yu wrote:
> The problem is Linux registers pm_power_off = efi_power_off
> only if we are in hardware reduced mode. Actually, what we also
> want is to do this when ACPI S5 is simply not supported on
> non-legacy platforms. Since there will be HW-full mode
The problem is Linux registers pm_power_off = efi_power_off
only if we are in hardware reduced mode. Actually, what we also
want is to do this when ACPI S5 is simply not supported on
non-legacy platforms. Since there will be HW-full mode where
the DSDT fails to supply an _S5 object(without
The problem is Linux registers pm_power_off = efi_power_off
only if we are in hardware reduced mode. Actually, what we also
want is to do this when ACPI S5 is simply not supported on
non-legacy platforms. Since there will be HW-full mode where
the DSDT fails to supply an _S5 object(without
6 matches
Mail list logo