Hi,
[no properly binding reference via In-Reply-To: available thus manually
re-creating, sorry]
> > So we can print warning in hibernation_die_notifier without
> > introducing a global variable?
> >
>
> Actually, I'd kill the machine right away.
>
> if (memcmp(result, buf, MD5_DIGEST_SIZE)) {
Yu C
> > > Cc: joeyli; Rafael J. Wysocki; linux...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > > ker...@vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH][v6] PM / hibernate: Print the possible panic
> > > reason when resuming with inconsistent e820 map
> > >
> > > On
r...@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH][v6] PM / hibernate: Print the possible panic reason
> > when
> > resuming with inconsistent e820 map
> >
> > On Sun 2016-08-28 10:07:10, Chen Yu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:56:54PM +0200,
> -Original Message-
> From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pa...@ucw.cz]
> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 8:48 PM
> To: Chen, Yu C
> Cc: joeyli; Rafael J. Wysocki; linux...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][v6] PM / hibernate: Print the
On Sun 2016-08-28 10:07:10, Chen Yu wrote:
> Hi,
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:56:54PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > > What's the progress of this patch? Looks already have experts
> > > > > > review it.
> > > > > > Why this patch didn't accept?
> > > > > This patch is a little
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:56:54PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > What's the progress of this patch? Looks already have experts review
> > > > > it.
> > > > > Why this patch didn't accept?
> > > > This patch is a little overkilled, and I have saved another simpler
> > > > versio
Hi!
> > > > What's the progress of this patch? Looks already have experts review it.
> > > > Why this patch didn't accept?
> > > This patch is a little overkilled, and I have saved another simpler
> > > version to only check the md5 hash (as people suggested) for it. I can
> > > post it later.
>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:36:10AM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> > > What's the progress of this patch? Looks already have experts review it.
> > > Why this patch didn't accept?
> > This patch is a little overkilled, and I have saved another simpler
> > version to only check the md5 hash (as people sugges
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 06:01:55PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for your interest :)
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:45:27PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:21:40PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> > > On some platforms, there is occasional panic triggered when try
Hi,
thanks for your interest :)
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:45:27PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:21:40PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> > On some platforms, there is occasional panic triggered when trying to
> > resume from hibernation, a typical panic looks like:
> >
>
Hi all,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:21:40PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> On some platforms, there is occasional panic triggered when trying to
> resume from hibernation, a typical panic looks like:
>
> "BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 880085894000
> IP: [] load_image_lzo+0x8c2/0xe70
On some platforms, there is occasional panic triggered when trying to
resume from hibernation, a typical panic looks like:
"BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 880085894000
IP: [] load_image_lzo+0x8c2/0xe70"
This is because e820 map has been changed by BIOS before/after
hibernation
12 matches
Mail list logo
