On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 05:10:24PM -0500, John Cavan wrote:
> it is. The new scsi error stuff does mention that drivers must
> spinunlock/spinlock if it enables interrupts.
Okay, I guess it is safe then.
Tim.
*/
PGP signature
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 05:10:24PM -0500, John Cavan wrote:
it is. The new scsi error stuff does mention that drivers must
spinunlock/spinlock if it enables interrupts.
Okay, I guess it is safe then.
Tim.
*/
PGP signature
Tim Waugh wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:50:40PM -0500, John Cavan wrote:
>
> > [...] This patch unlocks, allows the lowlevel driver to do it's
> > probes, and then relocks. It could probably be more granular in the
> > parport_pc code, but my own home tests show it to be working fine.
>
Tim Waugh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:50:40PM -0500, John Cavan wrote:
[...] This patch unlocks, allows the lowlevel driver to do it's
probes, and then relocks. It could probably be more granular in the
parport_pc code, but my own home tests show it to be working fine.
Is that
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:50:40PM -0500, John Cavan wrote:
> [...] This patch unlocks, allows the lowlevel driver to do it's
> probes, and then relocks. It could probably be more granular in the
> parport_pc code, but my own home tests show it to be working fine.
Is that safe?
Also, what bit
Jens Axboe wrote:
> Wouldn't it be more interesting to fix the reason the new error
> handling code dies with imm and ppa?
Yes it would... :o) I think I've got it here.
The new error handling code spinlocks the IRQ which cause the lowlevel
parport driver to choke. This patch unlocks, allows the
Jens Axboe wrote:
Wouldn't it be more interesting to fix the reason the new error
handling code dies with imm and ppa?
Yes it would... :o) I think I've got it here.
The new error handling code spinlocks the IRQ which cause the lowlevel
parport driver to choke. This patch unlocks, allows the
7 matches
Mail list logo
