Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:50:09 +0100
> Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>>> Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
>>> like disabling interrupts anymore, which would be
On Monday 30 April 2007 16:55:48 Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:50:09 +0100
> Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
> > > like disabling
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:50:09 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
> > like disabling interrupts anymore, which would be excessive.
> >
> > Longer term
> FWIW I think doing this first will be better, exposing _all_ to non GNU
> modules will weaken whatever case we might have to take it away later.
I have no problems taking it away later again. Or rather taking
away the symbols where non GPL code clearly has no business messing
with.
I don't
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 13:19 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 30 April 2007 13:15:36 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 30 2007 13:00, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >On Monday 30 April 2007 12:50:09 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >> >
On Monday 30 April 2007 13:15:36 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Apr 30 2007 13:00, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >On Monday 30 April 2007 12:50:09 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
On Apr 30 2007 13:00, Andi Kleen wrote:
>On Monday 30 April 2007 12:50:09 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> >
>> > Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
>> > like disabling interrupts anymore, which would be excessive.
On Apr 30 2007 11:50, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>> Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
>> like disabling interrupts anymore, which would be excessive.
>>
>> Longer term should split the single structure up into
On Monday 30 April 2007 12:50:09 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
> > like disabling interrupts anymore, which would be excessive.
> >
> > Longer term should split the single
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
> like disabling interrupts anymore, which would be excessive.
>
> Longer term should split the single structure up into
> internal and external symbols and not export the
Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
like disabling interrupts anymore, which would be excessive.
Longer term should split the single structure up into
internal and external symbols and not export the internal
ones at all.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
like disabling interrupts anymore, which would be excessive.
Longer term should split the single structure up into
internal and external symbols and not export the internal
ones at all.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
like disabling interrupts anymore, which would be excessive.
Longer term should split the single structure up into
internal and external symbols and not export the internal
On Monday 30 April 2007 12:50:09 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
like disabling interrupts anymore, which would be excessive.
Longer term should split the single structure up
On Apr 30 2007 11:50, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
like disabling interrupts anymore, which would be excessive.
Longer term should split the single structure up into
internal
On Apr 30 2007 13:00, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2007 12:50:09 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
like disabling interrupts anymore, which would be excessive.
Longer
On Monday 30 April 2007 13:15:36 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Apr 30 2007 13:00, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2007 12:50:09 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
like
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 13:19 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2007 13:15:36 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Apr 30 2007 13:00, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2007 12:50:09 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Otherwise
FWIW I think doing this first will be better, exposing _all_ to non GNU
modules will weaken whatever case we might have to take it away later.
I have no problems taking it away later again. Or rather taking
away the symbols where non GPL code clearly has no business messing
with.
I don't think
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:50:09 +0100
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
like disabling interrupts anymore, which would be excessive.
Longer term should split
On Monday 30 April 2007 16:55:48 Alan Cox wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:50:09 +0100
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
like disabling interrupts anymore,
Alan Cox wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:50:09 +0100
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Otherwise non GPL modules cannot even do basic operations
like disabling interrupts anymore, which would be excessive.
Longer
22 matches
Mail list logo
