From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:15:42 -0700
> The kernel bugzilla shows zaroo boogs for multipath cached as well.
Because _EVERYBODY_ turns it off because we tell them to do so! Every
bug reported to the lists is replied to with "that code is
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:56:13PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Pekka J Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:15:16 +0200 (EET)
>
> > On 3/9/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The whole cahce-multipath subsystem has to have it's guts revamped for
> > > proper
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:56:13PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Pekka J Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:15:16 +0200 (EET)
On 3/9/07, David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The whole cahce-multipath subsystem has to have it's guts revamped for
proper error
From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:15:42 -0700
The kernel bugzilla shows zaroo boogs for multipath cached as well.
Because _EVERYBODY_ turns it off because we tell them to do so! Every
bug reported to the lists is replied to with that code is
unbelievably
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:22:36PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:53:11 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
...
> > And there is absolutely no negotiations about this, I've held back on
> > this for nearly 2 years, and nothing has happened, this code is
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:22:36PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:53:11 -0700 (PDT) David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...
And there is absolutely no negotiations about this, I've held back on
this for nearly 2 years, and nothing has happened, this code is not
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:53:11 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> From: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:51:37 +0100
>
> > But until then it'll unnecessarily spoil linux opinion as regards
> > stability and waste time of developers to check
From: "Pekka Enberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:36:46 +0200
> On 3/12/07, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, maybe it's less evil to check those NULLs where possible and add
> > some WARN_ONs here and there...
>
> No, it's much better to oops rather than paper
From: Pekka J Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:15:16 +0200 (EET)
> On 3/9/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The whole cahce-multipath subsystem has to have it's guts revamped for
> > proper error handling.
>
> (Untested patch follows.)
I'm not accepting
From: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:51:37 +0100
> But until then it'll unnecessarily spoil linux opinion as regards
> stability and waste time of developers to check error messages.
> So, maybe it's less evil to check those NULLs where possible and add
> some
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 02:36:46PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 3/12/07, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >So, maybe it's less evil to check those NULLs where possible and add
> >some WARN_ONs here and there...
>
> No, it's much better to oops rather than paper over a bug.
>
I'm
On 3/12/07, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, maybe it's less evil to check those NULLs where possible and add
some WARN_ONs here and there...
No, it's much better to oops rather than paper over a bug.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
On 3/9/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The whole cahce-multipath subsystem has to have it's guts revamped for
> proper error handling.
(Untested patch follows.)
From: Amit Choudhary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Check the return value of kmalloc() in function wrandom_set_nhinfo(),
in file
On 09-03-2007 08:29, David Miller wrote:
> From: Amit Choudhary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:22:15 -0800
>
>> Description: Check the return value of kmalloc() in function
>> wrandom_set_nhinfo(), in file net/ipv4/multipath_wrandom.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Choudhary <[EMAIL
On 09-03-2007 08:29, David Miller wrote:
From: Amit Choudhary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:22:15 -0800
Description: Check the return value of kmalloc() in function
wrandom_set_nhinfo(), in file net/ipv4/multipath_wrandom.c.
Signed-off-by: Amit Choudhary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/9/07, David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The whole cahce-multipath subsystem has to have it's guts revamped for
proper error handling.
(Untested patch follows.)
From: Amit Choudhary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check the return value of kmalloc() in function wrandom_set_nhinfo(),
in file
On 3/12/07, Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, maybe it's less evil to check those NULLs where possible and add
some WARN_ONs here and there...
No, it's much better to oops rather than paper over a bug.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 02:36:46PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On 3/12/07, Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, maybe it's less evil to check those NULLs where possible and add
some WARN_ONs here and there...
No, it's much better to oops rather than paper over a bug.
I'm not sure I
From: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:51:37 +0100
But until then it'll unnecessarily spoil linux opinion as regards
stability and waste time of developers to check error messages.
So, maybe it's less evil to check those NULLs where possible and add
some WARN_ONs
From: Pekka Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:36:46 +0200
On 3/12/07, Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, maybe it's less evil to check those NULLs where possible and add
some WARN_ONs here and there...
No, it's much better to oops rather than paper over a bug.
From: Pekka J Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:15:16 +0200 (EET)
On 3/9/07, David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The whole cahce-multipath subsystem has to have it's guts revamped for
proper error handling.
(Untested patch follows.)
I'm not accepting untested patches,
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:53:11 -0700 (PDT) David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:51:37 +0100
But until then it'll unnecessarily spoil linux opinion as regards
stability and waste time of developers to check error messages.
From: Amit Choudhary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:22:15 -0800
> Description: Check the return value of kmalloc() in function
> wrandom_set_nhinfo(), in file net/ipv4/multipath_wrandom.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Choudhary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This kind of patch has been submitted
Description: Check the return value of kmalloc() in function
wrandom_set_nhinfo(), in file net/ipv4/multipath_wrandom.c.
Signed-off-by: Amit Choudhary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/multipath_wrandom.c b/net/ipv4/multipath_wrandom.c
index 92b0482..bcdb1f1 100644
---
Description: Check the return value of kmalloc() in function
wrandom_set_nhinfo(), in file net/ipv4/multipath_wrandom.c.
Signed-off-by: Amit Choudhary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/net/ipv4/multipath_wrandom.c b/net/ipv4/multipath_wrandom.c
index 92b0482..bcdb1f1 100644
---
From: Amit Choudhary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:22:15 -0800
Description: Check the return value of kmalloc() in function
wrandom_set_nhinfo(), in file net/ipv4/multipath_wrandom.c.
Signed-off-by: Amit Choudhary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This kind of patch has been submitted several
26 matches
Mail list logo
