On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> If this is a good idea, you can write a macro module_param_unsafe_named
>>> which is a general wrapper.
>>
>> For this to work I need to somehow store the safe default value somewhere.
>> since with bools or strings there really isn't such
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
If this is a good idea, you can write a macro module_param_unsafe_named
which is a general wrapper.
For this to work I need to somehow store the safe default value somewhere.
since with bools or strings there really
Daniel Vetter writes:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:19:54AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Daniel Vetter writes:
>> > Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
>> > all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
>> > it all fell apart.
>> >
>> >
Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch writes:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:19:54AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch writes:
Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
it
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:19:54AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Daniel Vetter writes:
> > Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
> > all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
> > it all fell apart.
> >
> > Even more fun when it's labelled
Daniel Vetter writes:
> Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
> all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
> it all fell apart.
>
> Even more fun when it's labelled a regression when some change only
> just made the feature possible (e.g.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:33:14 +0100 Daniel Vetter
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
>>> all the experimental stuff helps. Later
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:33:14 +0100 Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
>
>> Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
>> all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
>> it all fell apart.
>>
>> Even
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:33:14 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
> all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
> it all fell apart.
>
> Even more fun when it's labelled a regression when some change only
>
Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
it all fell apart.
Even more fun when it's labelled a regression when some change only
just made the feature possible (e.g. stolen memory fixes suddenly
Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
it all fell apart.
Even more fun when it's labelled a regression when some change only
just made the feature possible (e.g. stolen memory fixes suddenly
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:33:14 +0100 Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
it all fell apart.
Even more fun when it's labelled a regression when
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:33:14 +0100 Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
wrote:
Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:33:14 +0100 Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
wrote:
Users just love to set random piles of options since
Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch writes:
Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
it all fell apart.
Even more fun when it's labelled a regression when some change only
just made the feature
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:19:54AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch writes:
Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
it all fell apart.
Even more fun when
16 matches
Mail list logo
