Re: [PATCH] [SERIAL] add TP560 data/fax/modem support

2005-02-11 Thread Russell King
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:39:42PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Claim Topic TP560 data/fax/voice modem. This device reports as class 0x0780, > so we don't claim it by default: Applied, thanks. -- Russell King Linux kernel2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6

Re: [PATCH] [SERIAL] add TP560 data/fax/modem support

2005-02-11 Thread Russell King
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:39:42PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: Claim Topic TP560 data/fax/voice modem. This device reports as class 0x0780, so we don't claim it by default: Applied, thanks. -- Russell King Linux kernel2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6

Re: [PATCH] [SERIAL] add TP560 data/fax/modem support

2005-02-09 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 07:25 -0500, linux-os wrote: > On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 15:12 -0500, linux-os wrote: > >> I thought somebody promised to add a pci_route_irq(dev) or some > >> such so that the device didn't have to be enabled before > >> the IRQ

Re: [PATCH] [SERIAL] add TP560 data/fax/modem support

2005-02-09 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 07:25 -0500, linux-os wrote: On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 15:12 -0500, linux-os wrote: I thought somebody promised to add a pci_route_irq(dev) or some such so that the device didn't have to be enabled before the IRQ was correct.

Re: [PATCH] [SERIAL] add TP560 data/fax/modem support

2005-02-08 Thread linux-os
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 15:12 -0500, linux-os wrote: I thought somebody promised to add a pci_route_irq(dev) or some such so that the device didn't have to be enabled before the IRQ was correct. I first reported this bad IRQ problem back in December of 2004.

Re: [PATCH] [SERIAL] add TP560 data/fax/modem support

2005-02-08 Thread linux-os
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 15:12 -0500, linux-os wrote: I thought somebody promised to add a pci_route_irq(dev) or some such so that the device didn't have to be enabled before the IRQ was correct. I first reported this bad IRQ problem back in December of 2004.

Re: [PATCH] [SERIAL] add TP560 data/fax/modem support

2005-02-07 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 15:12 -0500, linux-os wrote: > I thought somebody promised to add a pci_route_irq(dev) or some > such so that the device didn't have to be enabled before > the IRQ was correct. > > I first reported this bad IRQ problem back in December of 2004. > Has the new function been

Re: [PATCH] [SERIAL] add TP560 data/fax/modem support

2005-02-07 Thread linux-os
I thought somebody promised to add a pci_route_irq(dev) or some such so that the device didn't have to be enabled before the IRQ was correct. I first reported this bad IRQ problem back in December of 2004. Has the new function been added? On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: Claim Topic TP560

[PATCH] [SERIAL] add TP560 data/fax/modem support

2005-02-07 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
Claim Topic TP560 data/fax/voice modem. This device reports as class 0x0780, so we don't claim it by default: 00:0d.0 Class 0780: 151f: Subsystem: 151f: Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11 Region 0: I/O ports at a400 [size=8]

[PATCH] [SERIAL] add TP560 data/fax/modem support

2005-02-07 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
Claim Topic TP560 data/fax/voice modem. This device reports as class 0x0780, so we don't claim it by default: 00:0d.0 Class 0780: 151f: Subsystem: 151f: Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11 Region 0: I/O ports at a400 [size=8]

Re: [PATCH] [SERIAL] add TP560 data/fax/modem support

2005-02-07 Thread linux-os
I thought somebody promised to add a pci_route_irq(dev) or some such so that the device didn't have to be enabled before the IRQ was correct. I first reported this bad IRQ problem back in December of 2004. Has the new function been added? On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: Claim Topic TP560

Re: [PATCH] [SERIAL] add TP560 data/fax/modem support

2005-02-07 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 15:12 -0500, linux-os wrote: I thought somebody promised to add a pci_route_irq(dev) or some such so that the device didn't have to be enabled before the IRQ was correct. I first reported this bad IRQ problem back in December of 2004. Has the new function been added?