On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 10:28 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Right, but ... I don't really see the value of switching either way, do
> you?
0) Sure I do, that's why I submitted this trivial patch in the first
place.
1) As I mentioned in the patch explanation: why bother using angle
brackets if one
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012, Paul Bolle wrote:
> The paths of the headers included by four "angle brackets includes"
> start with "..". So these includes are used to include headers that are
> not actually found in the include search path. Then we might as well
> include these headers using quote marks
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012, Paul Bolle wrote:
The paths of the headers included by four angle brackets includes
start with ... So these includes are used to include headers that are
not actually found in the include search path. Then we might as well
include these headers using quote marks and paths
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 10:28 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
Right, but ... I don't really see the value of switching either way, do
you?
0) Sure I do, that's why I submitted this trivial patch in the first
place.
1) As I mentioned in the patch explanation: why bother using angle
brackets if one is
4 matches
Mail list logo
