I'll rework as per your suggestions.
Thanks,
John
>
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 07:56:02 -0500
> John Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On SN, only allow one bit to be set in the smp_affinty mask
> > when redirecting an interrupt. Currently setting multiple
> > bits is allowed, but only the
On Thu, 03 May 2007 07:56:02 -0500
John Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On SN, only allow one bit to be set in the smp_affinty mask
> when redirecting an interrupt. Currently setting multiple
> bits is allowed, but only the first bit is used in
> determining the CPU to redirect to. This has
On SN, only allow one bit to be set in the smp_affinty mask
when redirecting an interrupt. Currently setting multiple
bits is allowed, but only the first bit is used in
determining the CPU to redirect to. This has caused confusion
among some customers.
Signed-off-by: John Keller <[EMAIL
On SN, only allow one bit to be set in the smp_affinty mask
when redirecting an interrupt. Currently setting multiple
bits is allowed, but only the first bit is used in
determining the CPU to redirect to. This has caused confusion
among some customers.
Signed-off-by: John Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 03 May 2007 07:56:02 -0500
John Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On SN, only allow one bit to be set in the smp_affinty mask
when redirecting an interrupt. Currently setting multiple
bits is allowed, but only the first bit is used in
determining the CPU to redirect to. This has caused
I'll rework as per your suggestions.
Thanks,
John
On Thu, 03 May 2007 07:56:02 -0500
John Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On SN, only allow one bit to be set in the smp_affinty mask
when redirecting an interrupt. Currently setting multiple
bits is allowed, but only the first bit is
6 matches
Mail list logo