Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-14 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 14 of January 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:40:58 +0100 > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yep, but please fix the whitespace. > > > > > > > > Pavel > > > > >

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-14 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:40:58 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Yep, but please fix the whitespace. > > > Pavel > > > > OK, attached. > > Is anyone taking care of this patch or should I do that?

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-14 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, 5 of January 2008, David Smith wrote: > > On Fri 2008-01-04 14:09:01, Kent Yoder wrote: > > > On Jan 4, 2008 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu 2008-01-03 21:44:15, Marcel Selhorst wrote: > > > > > Dear list, > > > > > > > > > > this patch fixes a bug,

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-14 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, 5 of January 2008, David Smith wrote: On Fri 2008-01-04 14:09:01, Kent Yoder wrote: On Jan 4, 2008 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu 2008-01-03 21:44:15, Marcel Selhorst wrote: Dear list, this patch fixes a bug, that prevents the TPM chip

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-14 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:40:58 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yep, but please fix the whitespace. Pavel OK, attached. Is anyone taking care of this patch or should I do that? Linus just merged it

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-14 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 14 of January 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:40:58 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yep, but please fix the whitespace. Pavel OK, attached. Is

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-04 Thread David Smith
> On Fri 2008-01-04 14:09:01, Kent Yoder wrote: > > On Jan 4, 2008 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu 2008-01-03 21:44:15, Marcel Selhorst wrote: > > > > Dear list, > > > > > > > > this patch fixes a bug, that prevents the TPM chip to resume > > > > correctly from a

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-04 Thread Pavel Machek
On Fri 2008-01-04 14:09:01, Kent Yoder wrote: > On Jan 4, 2008 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu 2008-01-03 21:44:15, Marcel Selhorst wrote: > > > Dear list, > > > > > > this patch fixes a bug, that prevents the TPM chip to resume correctly > > > from a > > >

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-04 Thread Marcel Selhorst
Kent is right, the solution from David is way better. I wanted to be consistent with the other functions in tpm.c, but it definitely makes more sense in Davids way. So please consider my patch as reverted and his patch as Signed-off-by: Marcel Selhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks, Marcel Kent

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-04 Thread Kent Yoder
On Jan 4, 2008 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu 2008-01-03 21:44:15, Marcel Selhorst wrote: > > Dear list, > > > > this patch fixes a bug, that prevents the TPM chip to resume correctly from > > a > > suspended state. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Selhorst <[EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-04 Thread Pavel Machek
On Thu 2008-01-03 21:44:15, Marcel Selhorst wrote: > Dear list, > > this patch fixes a bug, that prevents the TPM chip to resume correctly from a > suspended state. > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Selhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > --- linux-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c 2008-01-03 20:44:43.0

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-04 Thread Kent Yoder
On Jan 4, 2008 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu 2008-01-03 21:44:15, Marcel Selhorst wrote: Dear list, this patch fixes a bug, that prevents the TPM chip to resume correctly from a suspended state. Signed-off-by: Marcel Selhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [cut] I'm

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-04 Thread Marcel Selhorst
Kent is right, the solution from David is way better. I wanted to be consistent with the other functions in tpm.c, but it definitely makes more sense in Davids way. So please consider my patch as reverted and his patch as Signed-off-by: Marcel Selhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Marcel Kent

Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-04 Thread David Smith
On Fri 2008-01-04 14:09:01, Kent Yoder wrote: On Jan 4, 2008 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu 2008-01-03 21:44:15, Marcel Selhorst wrote: Dear list, this patch fixes a bug, that prevents the TPM chip to resume correctly from a suspended state.

[PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-03 Thread Marcel Selhorst
Dear list, this patch fixes a bug, that prevents the TPM chip to resume correctly from a suspended state. Signed-off-by: Marcel Selhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- --- linux-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c2008-01-03 20:44:43.0 +0100 +++ linux/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c2008-01-03

[PATCH] - TPM save state before suspending to ram

2008-01-03 Thread Marcel Selhorst
Dear list, this patch fixes a bug, that prevents the TPM chip to resume correctly from a suspended state. Signed-off-by: Marcel Selhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- linux-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c2008-01-03 20:44:43.0 +0100 +++ linux/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c2008-01-03