On Tuesday November 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This may be 2.2.18 material after all I wrote last night:
> > Making nfsd's d_splice() compensate for d_move's limitations is not
> > only a kludge, but also it harder to keep nfsd correct.
> > someday, nfsd may not be the only creator of thi
This may be 2.2.18 material after all I wrote last night:
> Making nfsd's d_splice() compensate for d_move's limitations is not
> only a kludge, but also it harder to keep nfsd correct.
> someday, nfsd may not be the only creator of this kind of dentry.
Sure enough, there is just such a bug
2 matches
Mail list logo