Re: [PATCH] 2.4.0 proc_fs for 2.2.18: UPDATED

2000-12-08 Thread Michael Rothwell
Michael Rothwell wrote: > > Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > Why is 2.2.18 proc_fs.c different than both 2.2.17 and 2.4.0? Cox, would > > > you accept a patch that makes 2.2.18 define create_proc_info_entry and > > > related functions the same way that 2.4.0 does? > > > > Send me a diff and I'll be

[PATCH] 2.4.0 proc_fs for 2.2.18

2000-12-08 Thread Michael Rothwell
Alan Cox wrote: > > > Why is 2.2.18 proc_fs.c different than both 2.2.17 and 2.4.0? Cox, would > > you accept a patch that makes 2.2.18 define create_proc_info_entry and > > related functions the same way that 2.4.0 does? > > Send me a diff and I'll be happy to Here it is, both inlined and as

[PATCH] 2.4.0 proc_fs for 2.2.18

2000-12-08 Thread Michael Rothwell
Alan Cox wrote: Why is 2.2.18 proc_fs.c different than both 2.2.17 and 2.4.0? Cox, would you accept a patch that makes 2.2.18 define create_proc_info_entry and related functions the same way that 2.4.0 does? Send me a diff and I'll be happy to Here it is, both inlined and as an

Re: [PATCH] 2.4.0 proc_fs for 2.2.18: UPDATED

2000-12-08 Thread Michael Rothwell
Michael Rothwell wrote: Alan Cox wrote: Why is 2.2.18 proc_fs.c different than both 2.2.17 and 2.4.0? Cox, would you accept a patch that makes 2.2.18 define create_proc_info_entry and related functions the same way that 2.4.0 does? Send me a diff and I'll be happy to Here it