On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 06:53:49AM +0200, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> An even better solution would be getting vmware 2.0.4 which seems to
> be a bit more 2.4-kernel compliant.
> It is not yet announced on their web from what I can see but you may
> already fetch it from p.ex. ftp://download1.vmware.c
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > This patch replaces a wee bit of code vmware wanted in include/linux/skbuff.h
> > although I'm guessing it was removed for a reason and vmware should be patched
> > to use the new method.
> >
>
> Better to patch vmware ra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This patch replaces a wee bit of code vmware wanted in include/linux/skbuff.h
> although I'm guessing it was removed for a reason and vmware should be patched
> to use the new method.
>
Better to patch vmware rather than the kernel. Here's a patch thet
should be applie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> --- skbuff.h.orig Tue May 1 18:41:50 2001
> +++ skbuff.hTue May 1 18:41:55 2001
> @@ -244,6 +244,11 @@
>
> /* Internal */
> #define skb_shinfo(SKB)((struct skb_shared_info *)((SKB)->end))
> +/* for vmware */
> +static inline atom
Despite VMware's webpage claiming compatibility issues with 2.4.x kernels I'd
been using it without any problem until I upgraded to 2.4.4. I couldn't use
their precompiled modules of course but compiling to match the running kernel
worked fine previously.
This patch replaces a wee bit of code vm
5 matches
Mail list logo