Re: [PATCH] 2.6.11 does not handle IRQ #0 on IXP4xx ARM platforms

2005-03-12 Thread Ben Dooks
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 08:03:58PM +0100, Juan M. de la Torre wrote: > > The original get_irqnr_and_bse macro leave Z flag set when the IRQ > being handled is #0, but the correct behaviour is to clear the flag > when there is at least one IRQ to handle. > > PS: Please CC me in the reply

[PATCH] 2.6.11 does not handle IRQ #0 on IXP4xx ARM platforms

2005-03-12 Thread Juan M. de la Torre
The original get_irqnr_and_bse macro leave Z flag set when the IRQ being handled is #0, but the correct behaviour is to clear the flag when there is at least one IRQ to handle. PS: Please CC me in the reply because i'm not subscribed to the list -- /jm ---

[PATCH] 2.6.11 does not handle IRQ #0 on IXP4xx ARM platforms

2005-03-12 Thread Juan M. de la Torre
The original get_irqnr_and_bse macro leave Z flag set when the IRQ being handled is #0, but the correct behaviour is to clear the flag when there is at least one IRQ to handle. PS: Please CC me in the reply because i'm not subscribed to the list -- /jm ---

Re: [PATCH] 2.6.11 does not handle IRQ #0 on IXP4xx ARM platforms

2005-03-12 Thread Ben Dooks
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 08:03:58PM +0100, Juan M. de la Torre wrote: The original get_irqnr_and_bse macro leave Z flag set when the IRQ being handled is #0, but the correct behaviour is to clear the flag when there is at least one IRQ to handle. PS: Please CC me in the reply because