On Thu 2016-12-22 19:19:43, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:00:01PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Actually.. the ACPI cleanup is fine. You did well :-).
> > Pavel
>
> Cool, so (forgive the naive question)
On Thu 2016-12-22 19:19:43, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:00:01PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Actually.. the ACPI cleanup is fine. You did well :-).
> > Pavel
>
> Cool, so (forgive the naive question)
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:00:01PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Actually.. the ACPI cleanup is fine. You did well :-).
>> Pavel
>
> Cool,
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:00:01PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Actually.. the ACPI cleanup is fine. You did well :-).
>> Pavel
>
> Cool, so (forgive the naive
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:00:01PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Actually.. the ACPI cleanup is fine. You did well :-).
> Pavel
Cool, so (forgive the naive question) what happens next? Maybe I'm too
used to the immediate
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:00:01PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Actually.. the ACPI cleanup is fine. You did well :-).
> Pavel
Cool, so (forgive the naive question) what happens next? Maybe I'm too
used to the immediate
On Mon 2016-12-12 15:22:22, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 15:20 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > Please... don't encourage people more, we have enough cleanup patches
> > > as is.
> >
> > I recognize that this patch is relatively inconsequential, but it is my
> > first patch to
On Mon 2016-12-12 15:22:22, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 15:20 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > Please... don't encourage people more, we have enough cleanup patches
> > > as is.
> >
> > I recognize that this patch is relatively inconsequential, but it is my
> > first patch to
Joe Perches writes:
> On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 23:22 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Mon 2016-12-12 10:39:15, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 09:56 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>> > > A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
> []
>> > > diff --git
Joe Perches writes:
> On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 23:22 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Mon 2016-12-12 10:39:15, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 09:56 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>> > > A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
> []
>> > > diff --git
On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 15:20 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > Please... don't encourage people more, we have enough cleanup patches
> > as is.
>
> I recognize that this patch is relatively inconsequential, but it is my
> first patch to the Linux kernel, and is teaching me how to wrangle my
>
On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 15:20 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > Please... don't encourage people more, we have enough cleanup patches
> > as is.
>
> I recognize that this patch is relatively inconsequential, but it is my
> first patch to the Linux kernel, and is teaching me how to wrangle my
>
> Please... don't encourage people more, we have enough cleanup patches
> as is.
I recognize that this patch is relatively inconsequential, but it is my
first patch to the Linux kernel, and is teaching me how to wrangle my
email client and about the development work flow. I plan to write a
blog
> Please... don't encourage people more, we have enough cleanup patches
> as is.
I recognize that this patch is relatively inconsequential, but it is my
first patch to the Linux kernel, and is teaching me how to wrangle my
email client and about the development work flow. I plan to write a
blog
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 00:08 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2016-12-12 14:32:12, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 23:22 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Mon 2016-12-12 10:39:15, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 09:56 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > A
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 00:08 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2016-12-12 14:32:12, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 23:22 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Mon 2016-12-12 10:39:15, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 09:56 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > > A
On Mon 2016-12-12 14:32:12, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 23:22 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon 2016-12-12 10:39:15, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 09:56 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
> []
> > > >
On Mon 2016-12-12 14:32:12, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 23:22 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon 2016-12-12 10:39:15, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 09:56 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
> []
> > > >
On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 23:22 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2016-12-12 10:39:15, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 09:56 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
[]
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 23:22 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2016-12-12 10:39:15, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 09:56 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
[]
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
On Mon 2016-12-12 10:39:15, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 09:56 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
>
> You might use the --strict option for acpi files.
Please... don't encourage people more, we have enough cleanup patches
as
On Mon 2016-12-12 10:39:15, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 09:56 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
>
> You might use the --strict option for acpi files.
Please... don't encourage people more, we have enough cleanup patches
as
On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 09:56 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
You might use the --strict option for acpi files.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
[]
> @@ -103,9 +103,8 @@ static long
On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 09:56 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
You might use the --strict option for acpi files.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
[]
> @@ -103,9 +103,8 @@ static long
>From 47d3bcb76ef89ddbe74c8d8aacee1c0c6203a766 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nick Desaulniers
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 09:50:23 -0800
Subject: [PATCH v2] ACPI: small formatting fixes
A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
Signed-off-by: Nick
>From 47d3bcb76ef89ddbe74c8d8aacee1c0c6203a766 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nick Desaulniers
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 09:50:23 -0800
Subject: [PATCH v2] ACPI: small formatting fixes
A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers
---
Hi!
> A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> /*
> * Copyright (C) 2005 Intel Corporation
> - * Venkatesh
Hi!
> A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> /*
> * Copyright (C) 2005 Intel Corporation
> - * Venkatesh Pallipadi
> - * - Added _PDC for
A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers
---
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers
---
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
index
A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers
---
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
A quick cleanup that passes scripts/checkpatch.pl -f .
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers
---
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
index
32 matches
Mail list logo