Paul Bolle wrote:
>
> s3c_rtc_setname() tests for CONFIG_SAMSUNG_DEV_RTC or
> CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX. But of these two macros only CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX
> actually exists. Now we can see that s3c_device_rtc is only defined if
> either CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX or CONFIG_S3C_DEV_RTC are defined. So,
>
Paul Bolle wrote:
s3c_rtc_setname() tests for CONFIG_SAMSUNG_DEV_RTC or
CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX. But of these two macros only CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX
actually exists. Now we can see that s3c_device_rtc is only defined if
either CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX or CONFIG_S3C_DEV_RTC are defined. So,
apparently,
s3c_rtc_setname() tests for CONFIG_SAMSUNG_DEV_RTC or
CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX. But of these two macros only CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX
actually exists. Now we can see that s3c_device_rtc is only defined if
either CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX or CONFIG_S3C_DEV_RTC are defined. So,
apparently, it was intended to use
s3c_rtc_setname() tests for CONFIG_SAMSUNG_DEV_RTC or
CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX. But of these two macros only CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX
actually exists. Now we can see that s3c_device_rtc is only defined if
either CONFIG_PLAT_S3C24XX or CONFIG_S3C_DEV_RTC are defined. So,
apparently, it was intended to use
4 matches
Mail list logo