Hi Daniel,
On 9 June 2015 at 19:37, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 09/06/15 16:01, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:41:50PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>>>
>>> Does the following patch, which makes the arch_irqs_disabled()
>>> implementation from asm-generic
2015-06-09 19:37 GMT+02:00 Daniel Thompson :
> On 09/06/15 16:01, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:41:50PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>>>
>>> Does the following patch, which makes the arch_irqs_disabled()
>>> implementation from asm-generic available on arm, fix
2015-06-09 19:37 GMT+02:00 Daniel Thompson daniel.thomp...@linaro.org:
On 09/06/15 16:01, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:41:50PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
Does the following patch, which makes the arch_irqs_disabled()
implementation from asm-generic available
Hi Daniel,
On 9 June 2015 at 19:37, Daniel Thompson daniel.thomp...@linaro.org wrote:
On 09/06/15 16:01, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:41:50PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
Does the following patch, which makes the arch_irqs_disabled()
implementation from
On 09/06/15 16:01, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:41:50PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
Does the following patch, which makes the arch_irqs_disabled()
implementation from asm-generic available on arm, fix the build for you?
Yes, this is exactly the kind of fix for
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:41:50PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> Does the following patch, which makes the arch_irqs_disabled()
> implementation from asm-generic available on arm, fix the build for you?
Yes, this is exactly the kind of fix for this I'm looking for. Once
everyone's happy with
Hi Daniel,
2015-06-09 13:41 GMT+02:00 Daniel Thompson :
> On 09/06/15 10:14, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>>
>>> The real solution is to provide a definition _in asm-generic_ for
>>> arch_irqs_disabled(), rather than having almost every arch doing:
>>>
>>> static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled(void)
On 09/06/15 10:14, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
The real solution is to provide a definition _in asm-generic_ for
arch_irqs_disabled(), rather than having almost every arch doing:
static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled(void)
{
return arch_irqs_disabled_flags(arch_local_save_flags());
}
I'm
2015-06-09 0:47 GMT+02:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:24:48AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>> Commit cb1293e2f594 ("ARM: 8375/1: disable some options on ARMv7-M") causes
>> build failure on ARMv7-M machines:
>>
>> CC arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.s
>> In file
2015-06-09 0:47 GMT+02:00 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:24:48AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
Commit cb1293e2f594 (ARM: 8375/1: disable some options on ARMv7-M) causes
build failure on ARMv7-M machines:
CC arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In
On 09/06/15 10:14, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
The real solution is to provide a definition _in asm-generic_ for
arch_irqs_disabled(), rather than having almost every arch doing:
static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled(void)
{
return arch_irqs_disabled_flags(arch_local_save_flags());
}
I'm
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:41:50PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
Does the following patch, which makes the arch_irqs_disabled()
implementation from asm-generic available on arm, fix the build for you?
Yes, this is exactly the kind of fix for this I'm looking for. Once
everyone's happy with it,
Hi Daniel,
2015-06-09 13:41 GMT+02:00 Daniel Thompson daniel.thomp...@linaro.org:
On 09/06/15 10:14, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
The real solution is to provide a definition _in asm-generic_ for
arch_irqs_disabled(), rather than having almost every arch doing:
static inline bool
On 09/06/15 16:01, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:41:50PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
Does the following patch, which makes the arch_irqs_disabled()
implementation from asm-generic available on arm, fix the build for you?
Yes, this is exactly the kind of fix for
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:24:48AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Commit cb1293e2f594 ("ARM: 8375/1: disable some options on ARMv7-M") causes
> build failure on ARMv7-M machines:
>
> CC arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.s
> In file included from include/linux/sem.h:5:0,
> from
Commit cb1293e2f594 ("ARM: 8375/1: disable some options on ARMv7-M") causes
build failure on ARMv7-M machines:
CC arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from include/linux/sem.h:5:0,
from include/linux/sched.h:35,
from
Commit cb1293e2f594 (ARM: 8375/1: disable some options on ARMv7-M) causes
build failure on ARMv7-M machines:
CC arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from include/linux/sem.h:5:0,
from include/linux/sched.h:35,
from
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:24:48AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
Commit cb1293e2f594 (ARM: 8375/1: disable some options on ARMv7-M) causes
build failure on ARMv7-M machines:
CC arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from include/linux/sem.h:5:0,
from
18 matches
Mail list logo
