On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:52:08PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 07:34:09PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > The next coming i.MX6 Solo X SoC also contains SAI module while we use
> > imp_pcm_init() for i.MX platform.
>
> I've applied this, though obviously it'd be better if we
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 07:34:09PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> The next coming i.MX6 Solo X SoC also contains SAI module while we use
> imp_pcm_init() for i.MX platform.
I've applied this, though obviously it'd be better if we had dmaengine
support for this SoC so that it was just a compatible
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 07:34:09PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
The next coming i.MX6 Solo X SoC also contains SAI module while we use
imp_pcm_init() for i.MX platform.
I've applied this, though obviously it'd be better if we had dmaengine
support for this SoC so that it was just a compatible
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:52:08PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 07:34:09PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
The next coming i.MX6 Solo X SoC also contains SAI module while we use
imp_pcm_init() for i.MX platform.
I've applied this, though obviously it'd be better if we had
The next coming i.MX6 Solo X SoC also contains SAI module while we use
imp_pcm_init() for i.MX platform.
So this patch adds one compatible route for imx6sx and updates the DT
doc accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt | 2 +-
The next coming i.MX6 Solo X SoC also contains SAI module while we use
imp_pcm_init() for i.MX platform.
So this patch adds one compatible route for imx6sx and updates the DT
doc accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen guangyu.c...@freescale.com
---
6 matches
Mail list logo
