> >
> > Using a higher bitclk then expected doesn't always work.
> > Here is an example:
> >
> > aplay -Dhw:0,0 -d 5 -r 48000 -f S24_LE -c 2 audio48k24b2c.wav
> >
> > In this case, the required bitclk is 48000 * 24 * 2 = 2304000 but the
> > closest bitclk that can be derived is 3072000. Since the
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 07:18:11PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> From: Daniel Baluta
>
> Using a higher bitclk then expected doesn't always work.
> Here is an example:
>
> aplay -Dhw:0,0 -d 5 -r 48000 -f S24_LE -c 2 audio48k24b2c.wav
>
> In this case, the required bitclk is 48000 * 24 * 2 =
From: Daniel Baluta
Using a higher bitclk then expected doesn't always work.
Here is an example:
aplay -Dhw:0,0 -d 5 -r 48000 -f S24_LE -c 2 audio48k24b2c.wav
In this case, the required bitclk is 48000 * 24 * 2 = 2304000
but the closest bitclk that can be derived is 3072000. Since
the clock is
3 matches
Mail list logo
