Re: [PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing v2

2014-01-07 Thread Mel Gorman
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:13:16PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 01:58:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:08:46 -0800 Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > From: Andi Kleen > > > > > > [It turns out the documentation patch was already merged > > > earlier.

Re: [PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing v2

2014-01-07 Thread Andi Kleen
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 01:58:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:08:46 -0800 Andi Kleen wrote: > > > From: Andi Kleen > > > > [It turns out the documentation patch was already merged > > earlier. So just resending without documentation.] > > Confused. How could we have

Re: [PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing v2

2014-01-07 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:08:46 -0800 Andi Kleen wrote: > From: Andi Kleen > > [It turns out the documentation patch was already merged > earlier. So just resending without documentation.] Confused. How could we have merged the documentation for this feature but not the feature itself? > As

Re: [PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing v2

2014-01-07 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:08:46 -0800 Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote: From: Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com [It turns out the documentation patch was already merged earlier. So just resending without documentation.] Confused. How could we have merged the documentation for this feature

Re: [PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing v2

2014-01-07 Thread Andi Kleen
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 01:58:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:08:46 -0800 Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote: From: Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com [It turns out the documentation patch was already merged earlier. So just resending without documentation.]

Re: [PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing v2

2014-01-07 Thread Mel Gorman
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:13:16PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 01:58:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:08:46 -0800 Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote: From: Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com [It turns out the documentation patch was

[PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing v2

2014-01-06 Thread Andi Kleen
From: Andi Kleen [It turns out the documentation patch was already merged earlier. So just resending without documentation.] As discussed earlier, this adds a working sysctl to enable/disable automatic numa memory balancing at runtime. This allows to track down performance problems with this

[PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing v2

2014-01-06 Thread Andi Kleen
From: Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com [It turns out the documentation patch was already merged earlier. So just resending without documentation.] As discussed earlier, this adds a working sysctl to enable/disable automatic numa memory balancing at runtime. This allows to track down performance

Re: [PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing.

2013-04-29 Thread David Rientjes
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 04:56:24PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > From: Andi Kleen > > > > As discussed earlier, this adds a working sysctl to enable/disable > > automatic numa memory balancing at runtime. > > > > This was possible earlier through

Re: [PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing.

2013-04-29 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 04:56:24PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > From: Andi Kleen > > As discussed earlier, this adds a working sysctl to enable/disable > automatic numa memory balancing at runtime. > > This was possible earlier through debugfs, but only with special > debugging options set. Also

Re: [PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing.

2013-04-29 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 04:56:24PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: From: Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com As discussed earlier, this adds a working sysctl to enable/disable automatic numa memory balancing at runtime. This was possible earlier through debugfs, but only with special debugging

Re: [PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing.

2013-04-29 Thread David Rientjes
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Mel Gorman wrote: On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 04:56:24PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: From: Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com As discussed earlier, this adds a working sysctl to enable/disable automatic numa memory balancing at runtime. This was possible earlier through

Re: [PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing.

2013-04-24 Thread Will Huck
On 04/25/2013 07:56 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: From: Andi Kleen As discussed earlier, this adds a working sysctl to enable/disable automatic numa memory balancing at runtime. This was possible earlier through debugfs, but only with special debugging options set. Also fix the boot message. One

[PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing.

2013-04-24 Thread Andi Kleen
From: Andi Kleen As discussed earlier, this adds a working sysctl to enable/disable automatic numa memory balancing at runtime. This was possible earlier through debugfs, but only with special debugging options set. Also fix the boot message. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen ---

[PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing.

2013-04-24 Thread Andi Kleen
From: Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com As discussed earlier, this adds a working sysctl to enable/disable automatic numa memory balancing at runtime. This was possible earlier through debugfs, but only with special debugging options set. Also fix the boot message. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen

Re: [PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing.

2013-04-24 Thread Will Huck
On 04/25/2013 07:56 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: From: Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com As discussed earlier, this adds a working sysctl to enable/disable automatic numa memory balancing at runtime. This was possible earlier through debugfs, but only with special debugging options set. Also fix the