> > >How far away is the capability to "teleport" processes from one machine to
> > >another over the network? Think of the uptime!
> > >
> >
> > It is here. Look at Mosix.
>
> No. Not for uptime.
>
> The "responsibility" for process completion does not get delegated. A process
> will
How far away is the capability to teleport processes from one machine to
another over the network? Think of the uptime!
It is here. Look at Mosix.
No. Not for uptime.
The responsibility for process completion does not get delegated. A process
will always be bound to it's
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 10:06:42AM -0700, Ben Ford wrote:
> Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
>
> >Hey, this is cool.
> >
> >How far away is the capability to "teleport" processes from one machine to
> >another over the network? Think of the uptime!
> >
>
> It is here. Look at Mosix.
No. Not
Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
>Hey, this is cool.
>
>How far away is the capability to "teleport" processes from one machine to
>another over the network? Think of the uptime!
>
It is here. Look at Mosix.
--
I'd rather listen to Newton than to Mundie [MS flunkie who made a speech on
the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> How do you relocate
> -- pages which are mlocked without violating RT contraints?
> -- pages which contain kernel pointers and might be accessed from
> interrupt context?
Those two are the same problem, essentially. You have to copy the page,
then map it
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:43:27AM -0400, Peter Rival wrote:
> > Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support?
>
> How do you hotswap RAM? What happens to the data that was on the
> removed memory module?
Dont know about the s390 - but on
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 01:15:53AM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
> Hey, this is cool.
>
> How far away is the capability to "teleport" processes from one machine to
> another over the network? Think of the uptime!
http://www.mosix.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:43:27AM -0400, Peter Rival wrote:
> Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support?
How do you hotswap RAM? What happens to the data that was on the
removed memory module?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
Hey, this is cool.
How far away is the capability to "teleport" processes from one machine to
another over the network? Think of the uptime!
--
Dwayne C. Litzenberger - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP signature
Hey, this is cool.
How far away is the capability to teleport processes from one machine to
another over the network? Think of the uptime!
--
Dwayne C. Litzenberger - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP signature
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:43:27AM -0400, Peter Rival wrote:
Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support?
How do you hotswap RAM? What happens to the data that was on the
removed memory module?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 01:15:53AM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
Hey, this is cool.
How far away is the capability to teleport processes from one machine to
another over the network? Think of the uptime!
http://www.mosix.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:43:27AM -0400, Peter Rival wrote:
Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support?
How do you hotswap RAM? What happens to the data that was on the
removed memory module?
Dont know about the s390 - but on some
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
How do you relocate
-- pages which are mlocked without violating RT contraints?
-- pages which contain kernel pointers and might be accessed from
interrupt context?
Those two are the same problem, essentially. You have to copy the page,
then map it into
Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
Hey, this is cool.
How far away is the capability to teleport processes from one machine to
another over the network? Think of the uptime!
It is here. Look at Mosix.
--
I'd rather listen to Newton than to Mundie [MS flunkie who made a speech on
the evil-ness
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 10:06:42AM -0700, Ben Ford wrote:
Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
Hey, this is cool.
How far away is the capability to teleport processes from one machine to
another over the network? Think of the uptime!
It is here. Look at Mosix.
No. Not for uptime.
The
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:19:09PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> This only leaves two issues, the first is device drivers and the
> second is the question whether we'd want the overhead needed to
> implement the (fairly easy) memory
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:34:16AM -0500, Mitch Adair wrote:
>
> Wouldn't that be lot of the same issues as a "swapoff" with some
> portion of that in use? (except for the kernel data case of
> course...)
>
> No. Swapoff makes pages
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Mitch Adair wrote:
> Wouldn't that be lot of the same issues as a "swapoff" with some
> portion of that in use? (except for the kernel data case of
> course...)
Basically, yes.
regards,
Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:43:27AM -0400, Peter Rival wrote:
>
> Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support?
>
> Adding memory probably isn't going to be too hard... but taking
> existing memory off line is tricky. You have to find
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:43:27AM -0400, Peter Rival wrote:
>
> Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support?
>
> Adding memory probably isn't going to be too hard... but taking
> existing memory off line is tricky. You have to find some way of
> finding
> Adding memory probably isn't going to be too hard... but taking
> existing memory off line is tricky. You have to find some way of
> finding all the pages that are in use and then dealing with them
> appropriately, and when some are locked or contain kernel data this
> would be extremely
Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support? Especially with
systems with Chipkill coming out, this would be great to support...
- Pete
Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You can find a new version of the hot swap cpu patch at:
>
>
Hi,
You can find a new version of the hot swap cpu patch at:
http://samba.org/~anton/patches/cpu_hotswap-2.4.3-patch
The version for s390 (you need to first apply the 2.4.3 kernel
patch available on the IBM s390 Linux website) is at:
Hi,
You can find a new version of the hot swap cpu patch at:
http://samba.org/~anton/patches/cpu_hotswap-2.4.3-patch
The version for s390 (you need to first apply the 2.4.3 kernel
patch available on the IBM s390 Linux website) is at:
Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support? Especially with
systems with Chipkill coming out, this would be great to support...
- Pete
Anton Blanchard wrote:
Hi,
You can find a new version of the hot swap cpu patch at:
http://samba.org/~anton/patches/cpu_hotswap-2.4.3-patch
Adding memory probably isn't going to be too hard... but taking
existing memory off line is tricky. You have to find some way of
finding all the pages that are in use and then dealing with them
appropriately, and when some are locked or contain kernel data this
would be extremely difficult I
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:43:27AM -0400, Peter Rival wrote:
Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support?
Adding memory probably isn't going to be too hard... but taking
existing memory off line is tricky. You have to find some way of
finding all the
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:43:27AM -0400, Peter Rival wrote:
Has anyone looked into memory hot swap/hot add support?
Adding memory probably isn't going to be too hard... but taking
existing memory off line is tricky. You have to find some way
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Mitch Adair wrote:
Wouldn't that be lot of the same issues as a swapoff with some
portion of that in use? (except for the kernel data case of
course...)
Basically, yes.
regards,
Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:34:16AM -0500, Mitch Adair wrote:
Wouldn't that be lot of the same issues as a swapoff with some
portion of that in use? (except for the kernel data case of
course...)
No. Swapoff makes pages allocated to
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:19:09PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
This only leaves two issues, the first is device drivers and the
second is the question whether we'd want the overhead needed to
implement the (fairly easy) memory relocation.
32 matches
Mail list logo
