* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:56:45 -0600
> Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 10:04 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> >
> > > Turn CONFIG_DMI into a selectable option if EMBEDDED is defined, in
> > > order to be able
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:56:45 -0600
Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 10:04 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Turn CONFIG_DMI into a selectable option if EMBEDDED is defined, in
order to be able to remove the DMI
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:56:45 -0600
Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 10:04 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>
> > Turn CONFIG_DMI into a selectable option if EMBEDDED is defined, in
> > order to be able to remove the DMI table scanning code if it's not
> > needed,
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 10:04 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Turn CONFIG_DMI into a selectable option if EMBEDDED is defined, in
> order to be able to remove the DMI table scanning code if it's not
> needed, and then reduce the kernel code size.
>
> With CONFIG_DMI (i.e before) :
>
>text
Hi,
Enclosed patch is an updated version, with proper credits to Matt
Mackall and the Linux Tiny project.
Sincerly,
Thomas
---
Turn CONFIG_DMI into a selectable option if EMBEDDED is defined, in
order to be able to remove the DMI table scanning code if it's not
needed, and then reduce the
Hi,
Enclosed patch is an updated version, with proper credits to Matt
Mackall and the Linux Tiny project.
Sincerly,
Thomas
---
Turn CONFIG_DMI into a selectable option if EMBEDDED is defined, in
order to be able to remove the DMI table scanning code if it's not
needed, and then reduce the
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 10:04 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Turn CONFIG_DMI into a selectable option if EMBEDDED is defined, in
order to be able to remove the DMI table scanning code if it's not
needed, and then reduce the kernel code size.
With CONFIG_DMI (i.e before) :
textdata
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:56:45 -0600
Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 10:04 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Turn CONFIG_DMI into a selectable option if EMBEDDED is defined, in
order to be able to remove the DMI table scanning code if it's not
needed, and then
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:33:23 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I resend a new one with proper credits, will Andrew pick it up and
> replace the old version by the new version ?
yup.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Hi Matt,
Thanks for your review.
Le Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:01:18 -0600,
Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Looks ok. Please preserve original authorship (ie me) in some fashion
> in your description.
Andrew seems to already have picked up the patch in -mm (I received an
e-mail +
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 17:58 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The enclosed patch allows to remove the DMI scanning code when
> CONFIG_EMBEDDED is defined. It's basically the dma_blacklist patch of
> Linux-Tiny ported to 2.6.25-rc1, with the required modifications. It
> allows to remove
Hi,
The enclosed patch allows to remove the DMI scanning code when
CONFIG_EMBEDDED is defined. It's basically the dma_blacklist patch of
Linux-Tiny ported to 2.6.25-rc1, with the required modifications. It
allows to remove ~10k from the kernel code/data size.
On top of this patch, I've tested if
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 17:58 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Hi,
The enclosed patch allows to remove the DMI scanning code when
CONFIG_EMBEDDED is defined. It's basically the dma_blacklist patch of
Linux-Tiny ported to 2.6.25-rc1, with the required modifications. It
allows to remove ~10k
Hi,
The enclosed patch allows to remove the DMI scanning code when
CONFIG_EMBEDDED is defined. It's basically the dma_blacklist patch of
Linux-Tiny ported to 2.6.25-rc1, with the required modifications. It
allows to remove ~10k from the kernel code/data size.
On top of this patch, I've tested if
Hi Matt,
Thanks for your review.
Le Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:01:18 -0600,
Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Looks ok. Please preserve original authorship (ie me) in some fashion
in your description.
Andrew seems to already have picked up the patch in -mm (I received an
e-mail +
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:33:23 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I resend a new one with proper credits, will Andrew pick it up and
replace the old version by the new version ?
yup.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
16 matches
Mail list logo
