Cleaning out my inbox I find things that are fun to read.
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013 18:02:47 +0100
Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not very familiar with the tracing framework, but I will try to
> comment on your questions.
>
> On 25/08/13 09:59, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On 08/22/2013 04:49:31 PM,
Cleaning out my inbox I find things that are fun to read.
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013 18:02:47 +0100
Zoltan Kiss zoltan.k...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm not very familiar with the tracing framework, but I will try to
comment on your questions.
On 25/08/13 09:59, Rob Landley wrote:
On 08/22/2013
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013 18:02:47 +0100
Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> > Why? (Both why do you need to #include a header outside a multiple
> > inclusion guard, and why is the additional header needed at all in
> > _every_ subsystem trace header?)
> I see only one inclusion guard here, the one above.
Hi,
I'm not very familiar with the tracing framework, but I will try to
comment on your questions.
On 25/08/13 09:59, Rob Landley wrote:
On 08/22/2013 04:49:31 PM, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
+#if !defined(_TRACE_SUBSYS_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
+#define _TRACE_SUBSYS_H
But this makes
Hi,
I'm not very familiar with the tracing framework, but I will try to
comment on your questions.
On 25/08/13 09:59, Rob Landley wrote:
On 08/22/2013 04:49:31 PM, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
+#if !defined(_TRACE_SUBSYS_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
+#define _TRACE_SUBSYS_H
But this makes
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013 18:02:47 +0100
Zoltan Kiss zoltan.k...@citrix.com wrote:
Why? (Both why do you need to #include a header outside a multiple
inclusion guard, and why is the additional header needed at all in
_every_ subsystem trace header?)
I see only one inclusion guard here, the one
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Zoltan Kiss (zoltan.k...@citrix.com) wrote:
> > The sample missed the moving of the header files into the events
> > subdirectory.
> > I've also extended it based on the existing headers, and mentioned the tiny
> > but important role of
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Zoltan Kiss (zoltan.k...@citrix.com) wrote:
The sample missed the moving of the header files into the events
subdirectory.
I've also extended it based on the existing headers, and mentioned the tiny
but important role of
On 08/22/2013 04:49:31 PM, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
The sample missed the moving of the header files into the events
subdirectory.
I've also extended it based on the existing headers, and mentioned
the tiny
but important role of CREATE_TRACE_POINTS.
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss
---
On 08/22/2013 04:49:31 PM, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
The sample missed the moving of the header files into the events
subdirectory.
I've also extended it based on the existing headers, and mentioned
the tiny
but important role of CREATE_TRACE_POINTS.
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss
* Zoltan Kiss (zoltan.k...@citrix.com) wrote:
> The sample missed the moving of the header files into the events subdirectory.
> I've also extended it based on the existing headers, and mentioned the tiny
> but important role of CREATE_TRACE_POINTS.
Given that we expect tracepoints to be used
* Zoltan Kiss (zoltan.k...@citrix.com) wrote:
The sample missed the moving of the header files into the events subdirectory.
I've also extended it based on the existing headers, and mentioned the tiny
but important role of CREATE_TRACE_POINTS.
Given that we expect tracepoints to be used though
The sample missed the moving of the header files into the events subdirectory.
I've also extended it based on the existing headers, and mentioned the tiny
but important role of CREATE_TRACE_POINTS.
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss
---
Documentation/trace/tracepoints.txt | 19 +--
1
The sample missed the moving of the header files into the events subdirectory.
I've also extended it based on the existing headers, and mentioned the tiny
but important role of CREATE_TRACE_POINTS.
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss zoltan.k...@citrix.com
---
Documentation/trace/tracepoints.txt | 19
14 matches
Mail list logo
