On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 12:15:50AM +, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> "Paul E. McKenney" writes:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:01:36PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800
> >> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> >>
> >> > I am guessing that this patch is against an old
"Paul E. McKenney" writes:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:01:36PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800
>> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
>>
>> > I am guessing that this patch is against an old version of this file
>> > (there have been two patches applied to this example
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:01:36PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800
> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
>
> > I am guessing that this patch is against an old version of this file
> > (there have been two patches applied to this example in the last six
> > months). I
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> I am guessing that this patch is against an old version of this file
> (there have been two patches applied to this example in the last six
> months). I believe that the current version is correct, in other words,
> that Alexey
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:15:19PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:19:26 +0530
> Srikanth Thokala wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Kindly review the patch.
>
> To me it looks right. Something like this, though, needs an ack from
> Paul (cc'd) before I can be really confident.
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:19:26 +0530
Srikanth Thokala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kindly review the patch.
To me it looks right. Something like this, though, needs an ack from
Paul (cc'd) before I can be really confident. Paul...?
jon
> Thanks
> Srikanth
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Srikanth
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:19:26 +0530
Srikanth Thokala sriku.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Kindly review the patch.
To me it looks right. Something like this, though, needs an ack from
Paul (cc'd) before I can be really confident. Paul...?
jon
Thanks
Srikanth
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:09
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:15:19PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:19:26 +0530
Srikanth Thokala sriku.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Kindly review the patch.
To me it looks right. Something like this, though, needs an ack from
Paul (cc'd) before I can be really
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I am guessing that this patch is against an old version of this file
(there have been two patches applied to this example in the last six
months). I believe that the current version is correct, in other
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:01:36PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I am guessing that this patch is against an old version of this file
(there have been two patches applied to this example in the last six
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:01:36PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I am guessing that this patch is against an old version of this file
(there have been
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 12:15:50AM +, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:01:36PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I am guessing that
Hi,
Kindly review the patch.
Thanks
Srikanth
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Srikanth Thokala
wrote:
> In the first example, the loads into 'x' and 'y' on CPU 2 doesn't
> match the sequence of events described below it. To match the
> sequence of events, the values of 'A' and 'B' should be
Hi,
Kindly review the patch.
Thanks
Srikanth
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Srikanth Thokala
sriku.li...@gmail.com wrote:
In the first example, the loads into 'x' and 'y' on CPU 2 doesn't
match the sequence of events described below it. To match the
sequence of events, the values of 'A'
In the first example, the loads into 'x' and 'y' on CPU 2 doesn't
match the sequence of events described below it. To match the
sequence of events, the values of 'A' and 'B' should be loaded
into 'x' and 'y' respectively.
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Thokala
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt |
In the first example, the loads into 'x' and 'y' on CPU 2 doesn't
match the sequence of events described below it. To match the
sequence of events, the values of 'A' and 'B' should be loaded
into 'x' and 'y' respectively.
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Thokala sriku.li...@gmail.com
---
16 matches
Mail list logo