Re: [PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-12-02 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 12:15:50AM +, Måns Rullgård wrote: > "Paul E. McKenney" writes: > > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:01:36PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > >> On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800 > >> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > >> > >> > I am guessing that this patch is against an old

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-12-02 Thread Måns Rullgård
"Paul E. McKenney" writes: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:01:36PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800 >> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: >> >> > I am guessing that this patch is against an old version of this file >> > (there have been two patches applied to this example

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-12-02 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:01:36PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800 > "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > > > I am guessing that this patch is against an old version of this file > > (there have been two patches applied to this example in the last six > > months). I

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-12-02 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > I am guessing that this patch is against an old version of this file > (there have been two patches applied to this example in the last six > months). I believe that the current version is correct, in other words, > that Alexey

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-12-02 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:15:19PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:19:26 +0530 > Srikanth Thokala wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Kindly review the patch. > > To me it looks right. Something like this, though, needs an ack from > Paul (cc'd) before I can be really confident.

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-12-02 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:19:26 +0530 Srikanth Thokala wrote: > Hi, > > Kindly review the patch. To me it looks right. Something like this, though, needs an ack from Paul (cc'd) before I can be really confident. Paul...? jon > Thanks > Srikanth > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Srikanth

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-12-02 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:19:26 +0530 Srikanth Thokala sriku.li...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Kindly review the patch. To me it looks right. Something like this, though, needs an ack from Paul (cc'd) before I can be really confident. Paul...? jon Thanks Srikanth On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:09

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-12-02 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:15:19PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote: On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:19:26 +0530 Srikanth Thokala sriku.li...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Kindly review the patch. To me it looks right. Something like this, though, needs an ack from Paul (cc'd) before I can be really

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-12-02 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800 Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: I am guessing that this patch is against an old version of this file (there have been two patches applied to this example in the last six months). I believe that the current version is correct, in other

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-12-02 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:01:36PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote: On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800 Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: I am guessing that this patch is against an old version of this file (there have been two patches applied to this example in the last six

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-12-02 Thread Måns Rullgård
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes: On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:01:36PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote: On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800 Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: I am guessing that this patch is against an old version of this file (there have been

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-12-02 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 12:15:50AM +, Måns Rullgård wrote: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes: On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:01:36PM -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote: On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:50:06 -0800 Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: I am guessing that

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-11-26 Thread Srikanth Thokala
Hi, Kindly review the patch. Thanks Srikanth On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Srikanth Thokala wrote: > In the first example, the loads into 'x' and 'y' on CPU 2 doesn't > match the sequence of events described below it. To match the > sequence of events, the values of 'A' and 'B' should be

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-11-26 Thread Srikanth Thokala
Hi, Kindly review the patch. Thanks Srikanth On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Srikanth Thokala sriku.li...@gmail.com wrote: In the first example, the loads into 'x' and 'y' on CPU 2 doesn't match the sequence of events described below it. To match the sequence of events, the values of 'A'

[PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-11-17 Thread Srikanth Thokala
In the first example, the loads into 'x' and 'y' on CPU 2 doesn't match the sequence of events described below it. To match the sequence of events, the values of 'A' and 'B' should be loaded into 'x' and 'y' respectively. Signed-off-by: Srikanth Thokala --- Documentation/memory-barriers.txt |

[PATCH] Documentation: memory-barriers: Fix typo in the first example

2014-11-17 Thread Srikanth Thokala
In the first example, the loads into 'x' and 'y' on CPU 2 doesn't match the sequence of events described below it. To match the sequence of events, the values of 'A' and 'B' should be loaded into 'x' and 'y' respectively. Signed-off-by: Srikanth Thokala sriku.li...@gmail.com ---