Re: [PATCH] I2C: i2c-pxa - remove incorrect __exit annotations

2013-02-21 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:50:10AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > The remove() methods should not be marked __exit unless we are using > platform_driver_probe() which disables unbinding device from driver > via sysfs. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov Eeks, I broke this with my very first

Re: [PATCH] I2C: i2c-pxa - remove incorrect __exit annotations

2013-02-21 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:50:10AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: The remove() methods should not be marked __exit unless we are using platform_driver_probe() which disables unbinding device from driver via sysfs. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com Eeks, I broke this

[PATCH] I2C: i2c-pxa - remove incorrect __exit annotations

2013-02-20 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
The remove() methods should not be marked __exit unless we are using platform_driver_probe() which disables unbinding device from driver via sysfs. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov --- Compiled only, no hardware. drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

[PATCH] I2C: i2c-pxa - remove incorrect __exit annotations

2013-02-20 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
The remove() methods should not be marked __exit unless we are using platform_driver_probe() which disables unbinding device from driver via sysfs. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torok...@gmail.com --- Compiled only, no hardware. drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2