On Wed, 13 May 2020 15:43:16 -0300 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 08:51:50PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 May 2020 13:59:21 -0500 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> > > extension to the C90 standard,
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 08:51:50PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2020 13:59:21 -0500 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> > variable-length types
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 03:33:35PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 01:59:21PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> > variable-length
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 01:59:21PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced
On Thu, 7 May 2020 13:59:21 -0500 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By
6 matches
Mail list logo
