On 07/06/19 18:04, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> That's what came to mind first, but then "extended" had the same issue
>> as "full" (i.e. encompassing the "basic" set as well) so I decided you
>> knew better!
> Ah, I was thinking of "basic" and "extended" as separate states, but your
> interpretat
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 07/06/19 16:18, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 02:19:20PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 06/06/19 20:41, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> +static void prepare_vmcs02_early_extra(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
>
On 07/06/19 16:18, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 02:19:20PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 06/06/19 20:41, Sean Christopherson wrote:
+static void prepare_vmcs02_early_extra(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
>>> Or maybe 'uncommon', 'rare' or 'ext'? I don't I particularly love a
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 02:19:20PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 06/06/19 20:41, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> >> +static void prepare_vmcs02_early_extra(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
> > Or maybe 'uncommon', 'rare' or 'ext'? I don't I particularly love any of
> > the names, but they're all better than
On 06/06/19 20:41, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> +static void prepare_vmcs02_early_extra(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
> Or maybe 'uncommon', 'rare' or 'ext'? I don't I particularly love any of
> the names, but they're all better than 'full'.
I thought 'ext' was short for 'extra'? :)
Paolo
On 06/06/19 21:19, Krish Sadhukhan wrote:
>
> The big chunk of the work in this function is done via
> prepare_vmcs02_constant_state(). It seems cleaner to get rid of
> prepare_vmcs02_early_full(), call prepare_vmcs02_constant_state()
> directly from prepare_vmcs02_early() and move the three vmcs_
On 06/06/2019 11:41 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 05:24:12PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
These function do not prepare the entire state of the vmcs02, only the
rarely needed parts. Rename them to make this clearer.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
arch/x86/kvm/vm
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 05:24:12PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> These function do not prepare the entire state of the vmcs02, only the
> rarely needed parts. Rename them to make this clearer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 8
> 1 file changed, 4 i
These function do not prepare the entire state of the vmcs02, only the
rarely needed parts. Rename them to make this clearer.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x
9 matches
Mail list logo