Hi,
this patch fills in the portions for ia64 kexec.
I'm actually not sure what options are required for the dump-capture
kernel, but "init 1 irqpoll maxcpus=1" has been working fine for me.
Or more to the point, I'm not sure if irqpoll is needed or not.
This patch requires the documentation
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:46:39AM -0800, Jay Lan wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this patch fills in the portions for ia64 kexec.
> >
> > I'm actually not sure what options are required for the dump-capture
> > kernel, but "init 1 irqpoll maxcpus=1" has been working fine for me.
> > Or
Horms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch fills in the portions for ia64 kexec.
>
> I'm actually not sure what options are required for the dump-capture
> kernel, but "init 1 irqpoll maxcpus=1" has been working fine for me.
> Or more to the point, I'm not sure if irqpoll is needed or not.
>
> This
Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> + If the start address is specified, not that the start address of the
note
> + kernel will be alligned to 64Mb, so any if the start address is not then
aligned XXX
> + any space below
Hi,
this patch fills in the portions for ia64 kexec.
I'm actually not sure what options are required for the dump-capture
kernel, but "init 1 irqpoll maxcpus=1" has been working fine for me.
Or more to the point, I'm not sure if irqpoll is needed or not.
This patch requires the documentation
nux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] Kdump documentation update for 2.6.20: ia64 portion
>
> Hi,
>
> this patch fills in the portions for ia64 kexec.
>
> I'm actually not sure what options are required for the dump-capture
> kernel, but "init 1 irqpoll maxcpus=1&
: [PATCH] Kdump documentation update for 2.6.20: ia64 portion
Hi,
this patch fills in the portions for ia64 kexec.
I'm actually not sure what options are required for the dump-capture
kernel, but init 1 irqpoll maxcpus=1 has been working fine for me.
Or more to the point, I'm not sure
Hi,
this patch fills in the portions for ia64 kexec.
I'm actually not sure what options are required for the dump-capture
kernel, but init 1 irqpoll maxcpus=1 has been working fine for me.
Or more to the point, I'm not sure if irqpoll is needed or not.
This patch requires the documentation
Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+ If the start address is specified, not that the start address of the
note
+ kernel will be alligned to 64Mb, so any if the start address is not then
aligned XXX
+ any space below the
Horms wrote:
Hi,
this patch fills in the portions for ia64 kexec.
I'm actually not sure what options are required for the dump-capture
kernel, but init 1 irqpoll maxcpus=1 has been working fine for me.
Or more to the point, I'm not sure if irqpoll is needed or not.
This patch requires
Hi,
this patch fills in the portions for ia64 kexec.
I'm actually not sure what options are required for the dump-capture
kernel, but init 1 irqpoll maxcpus=1 has been working fine for me.
Or more to the point, I'm not sure if irqpoll is needed or not.
This patch requires the documentation
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:46:39AM -0800, Jay Lan wrote:
Horms wrote:
Hi,
this patch fills in the portions for ia64 kexec.
I'm actually not sure what options are required for the dump-capture
kernel, but init 1 irqpoll maxcpus=1 has been working fine for me.
Or more to the point,
Hi,
this patch fills in the portions for ia64 kexec.
I'm actually not sure what options are required for the dump-capture
kernel, but "init 1 irqpoll maxcpus=1" has been working fine for me.
Or more to the point, I'm not sure if irqpoll is needed or not.
This patch requires the documentation
Hi,
Mohan Kumar suggested making kexec-tools-testing.tar.gz a link
to the latest version. I have done this and this patch updates the
documentation accordingly.
This patch requires the documentation patch update that Vivek Goyal has
been circulating, and I believe is currently in mm. Feel free
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:45:15PM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:07:05AM +0530, Mohan Kumar M wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:17:08PM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > >
> > > Mohan, Can you please check the correctness of ppc64 specific details.
> > >
> >
> > Vivek,
>
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:45:15PM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:07:05AM +0530, Mohan Kumar M wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:17:08PM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
Mohan, Can you please check the correctness of ppc64 specific details.
Vivek,
My inputs.
Hi,
this patch fills in the portions for ia64 kexec.
I'm actually not sure what options are required for the dump-capture
kernel, but init 1 irqpoll maxcpus=1 has been working fine for me.
Or more to the point, I'm not sure if irqpoll is needed or not.
This patch requires the documentation
Hi,
Mohan Kumar suggested making kexec-tools-testing.tar.gz a link
to the latest version. I have done this and this patch updates the
documentation accordingly.
This patch requires the documentation patch update that Vivek Goyal has
been circulating, and I believe is currently in mm. Feel free
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:07:05AM +0530, Mohan Kumar M wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:17:08PM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >
> > Mohan, Can you please check the correctness of ppc64 specific details.
> >
>
> Vivek,
>
> My inputs.
>
Thanks Mohan. I have updated the document as per your
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:07:05AM +0530, Mohan Kumar M wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:17:08PM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
Mohan, Can you please check the correctness of ppc64 specific details.
Vivek,
My inputs.
Thanks Mohan. I have updated the document as per your feedback.
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:17:08PM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
> Mohan, Can you please check the correctness of ppc64 specific details.
>
Vivek,
My inputs.
> > > + --append="root= init 1 irqpoll maxcpus=1"
> > > +
> > > +If you are using a relocatable kernel (method 2), then use
> > >
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:53:34AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:34:12AM +0800, Zou, Nanhai wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I am hoping it --args-linux will be required while loading vmlinux on
> > > > IA64? Because this is ELF file specific option. And this interface
> > > > should
> >
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:34:12AM +0800, Zou, Nanhai wrote:
> > >
> > > I am hoping it --args-linux will be required while loading vmlinux on
> > > IA64? Because this is ELF file specific option. And this interface should
> > > be common across all the architectures.
> > >
> > > > Then again, I
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Horms
> Sent: 2007年1月10日 8:31
> To: Vivek Goyal
> Cc: linux kernel mailing list; Fastboot mailing list; Morton Andrew Morton;
> Mohan Kumar M
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kdump documen
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:17:08PM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:18:47AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > Download and build the system and dump-capture kernels
> > > --
> > > +There are two possible methods of using Kdump.
>
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:18:47AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Download and build the system and dump-capture kernels
> > --
> > +There are two possible methods of using Kdump.
> > +
> > + 1) Build a separate custom dump-capture kernel for
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:18:47AM +0900, Horms wrote:
Download and build the system and dump-capture kernels
--
+There are two possible methods of using Kdump.
+
+ 1) Build a separate custom dump-capture kernel for capturing the
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:17:08PM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:18:47AM +0900, Horms wrote:
Download and build the system and dump-capture kernels
--
+There are two possible methods of using Kdump.
+
+ 1)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Horms
Sent: 2007年1月10日 8:31
To: Vivek Goyal
Cc: linux kernel mailing list; Fastboot mailing list; Morton Andrew Morton;
Mohan Kumar M
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kdump documentation update for 2.6.20
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:34:12AM +0800, Zou, Nanhai wrote:
I am hoping it --args-linux will be required while loading vmlinux on
IA64? Because this is ELF file specific option. And this interface should
be common across all the architectures.
Then again, I could be wrong, I'm
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:53:34AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:34:12AM +0800, Zou, Nanhai wrote:
I am hoping it --args-linux will be required while loading vmlinux on
IA64? Because this is ELF file specific option. And this interface
should
be common across
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:17:08PM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
Mohan, Can you please check the correctness of ppc64 specific details.
Vivek,
My inputs.
+ --append=root=root-dev init 1 irqpoll maxcpus=1
+
+If you are using a relocatable kernel (method 2), then use
+following
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 01:28:03PM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
>
>
> o Kdump documentation update.
> - Update details for using relocatable kernel.
> - Start using kexec-tools-testing release as it is latest and old
> kexec-tools can't load relocatable bzImage file.
>
>
o Kdump documentation update.
- Update details for using relocatable kernel.
- Start using kexec-tools-testing release as it is latest and old
kexec-tools can't load relocatable bzImage file.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
o Kdump documentation update.
- Update details for using relocatable kernel.
- Start using kexec-tools-testing release as it is latest and old
kexec-tools can't load relocatable bzImage file.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 01:28:03PM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
o Kdump documentation update.
- Update details for using relocatable kernel.
- Start using kexec-tools-testing release as it is latest and old
kexec-tools can't load relocatable bzImage file.
36 matches
Mail list logo
