On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:22:19AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:20:33 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:21:13PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > > Opening braces should go on the same line as the statement (if (...)
> >
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:21:13PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> This should do it:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-02-07 13:19:59+01:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> input: Do a kill_fasync() in input handlers on device disconnect
>
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:21:13PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
This should do it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-02-07 13:19:59+01:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
input: Do a kill_fasync() in input handlers on device disconnect
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:22:19AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:20:33 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:21:13PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Opening braces should go on the same line as the statement (if (...)
{).
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:20:33 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:21:13PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > Opening braces should go on the same line as the statement (if (...) {).
> > >
> > > How about this patch?
> >
> > Looks fine now. Hmm, wait a
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:21:13PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Opening braces should go on the same line as the statement (if (...) {).
> >
> > How about this patch?
>
> Looks fine now. Hmm, wait a sec... Don't we also need kill_fasync calls in
> disconnect routines as well?
This
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:21:13PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Opening braces should go on the same line as the statement (if (...) {).
How about this patch?
Looks fine now. Hmm, wait a sec... Don't we also need kill_fasync calls in
disconnect routines as well?
This should do it:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:20:33 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:21:13PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Opening braces should go on the same line as the statement (if (...) {).
How about this patch?
Looks fine now. Hmm, wait a sec... Don't we
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:21:13PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Sunday 06 February 2005 08:12, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:24:39AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:52:15 -0600, David Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Currently a
On Sunday 06 February 2005 08:12, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:24:39AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:52:15 -0600, David Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Currently a blocking read, select, or poll call will not return if a
> > > joystick device
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:24:39AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:52:15 -0600, David Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Currently a blocking read, select, or poll call will not return if a
> > joystick device is unplugged. This patch allows them to return.
> >
> ...
> >
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:24:39AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:52:15 -0600, David Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently a blocking read, select, or poll call will not return if a
joystick device is unplugged. This patch allows them to return.
...
static
On Sunday 06 February 2005 08:12, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:24:39AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:52:15 -0600, David Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently a blocking read, select, or poll call will not return if a
joystick device is
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:21:13PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sunday 06 February 2005 08:12, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:24:39AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:52:15 -0600, David Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently a blocking read,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:52:15 -0600, David Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently a blocking read, select, or poll call will not return if a
> joystick device is unplugged. This patch allows them to return.
>
...
> static unsigned int joydev_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
> {
> +
Currently a blocking read, select, or poll call will not return if a
joystick device is unplugged. This patch allows them to return.
This patch adds a wake_up_interruptible call to the joydev_disconnect
to interrupt both a blocking read and a blocking poll call. The read
routine was already
Currently a blocking read, select, or poll call will not return if a
joystick device is unplugged. This patch allows them to return.
This patch adds a wake_up_interruptible call to the joydev_disconnect
to interrupt both a blocking read and a blocking poll call. The read
routine was already
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:52:15 -0600, David Fries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently a blocking read, select, or poll call will not return if a
joystick device is unplugged. This patch allows them to return.
...
static unsigned int joydev_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
{
+
18 matches
Mail list logo
