Re: [PATCH] Match DMA blacklist entries between ide-dma.c and libata-core.c

2007-05-23 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Tuesday 22 May 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > There are a few entries in ata_device_blacklist[] in libata-core.c > marked with HORKAGE_NODMA but are missing from drive_blacklist[] > in ide-dma.c. This patch makes the lists in sync. > > Also remove a duplicated entry for "SanDisk SDP3B-64". >

Re: [PATCH] Match DMA blacklist entries between ide-dma.c and libata-core.c

2007-05-23 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Tuesday 22 May 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: There are a few entries in ata_device_blacklist[] in libata-core.c marked with HORKAGE_NODMA but are missing from drive_blacklist[] in ide-dma.c. This patch makes the lists in sync. Also remove a duplicated entry for SanDisk SDP3B-64.

[PATCH] Match DMA blacklist entries between ide-dma.c and libata-core.c

2007-05-21 Thread Junio C Hamano
There are a few entries in ata_device_blacklist[] in libata-core.c marked with HORKAGE_NODMA but are missing from drive_blacklist[] in ide-dma.c. This patch makes the lists in sync. Also remove a duplicated entry for "SanDisk SDP3B-64". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- *

[PATCH] Match DMA blacklist entries between ide-dma.c and libata-core.c

2007-05-21 Thread Junio C Hamano
There are a few entries in ata_device_blacklist[] in libata-core.c marked with HORKAGE_NODMA but are missing from drive_blacklist[] in ide-dma.c. This patch makes the lists in sync. Also remove a duplicated entry for SanDisk SDP3B-64. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- *