On 4/10/07, Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does a parent death signal make most sense between separately written
programs?
I don't think it does. It has always seemed an utterly cockamamy feature
to me, and I've never understood what actually motivated it.
It's useful, but the
> Does a parent death signal make most sense between separately written
> programs?
I don't think it does. It has always seemed an utterly cockamamy feature
to me, and I've never understood what actually motivated it.
> Does a parent death signal make most sense between processes that are part
Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 04/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> So this patch fixes the pdeath_signal behaviour only sending a signal
>> when the results of getppid would change.
>
> Don't get me wrong, I personally like this patch very much. However,
Good point.
I guess
On 04/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> So this patch fixes the pdeath_signal behaviour only sending a signal
> when the results of getppid would change.
Don't get me wrong, I personally like this patch very much. However,
A long ago, Albert Cahalan (cc-ed) wrote:
>
> I rely on thread-to-thread
Currently each thread can requrest to be notified when it's parent
terminates, and receive a thread specific signal when that occurs.
That we set this on a per thread granularity and then send it to the
whole thread group seems silly, but whatever.
Currently we send a signal when the results of
Currently each thread can requrest to be notified when it's parent
terminates, and receive a thread specific signal when that occurs.
That we set this on a per thread granularity and then send it to the
whole thread group seems silly, but whatever.
Currently we send a signal when the results of
On 04/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
So this patch fixes the pdeath_signal behaviour only sending a signal
when the results of getppid would change.
Don't get me wrong, I personally like this patch very much. However,
A long ago, Albert Cahalan (cc-ed) wrote:
I rely on thread-to-thread
Oleg Nesterov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 04/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
So this patch fixes the pdeath_signal behaviour only sending a signal
when the results of getppid would change.
Don't get me wrong, I personally like this patch very much. However,
Good point.
I guess we have a
Does a parent death signal make most sense between separately written
programs?
I don't think it does. It has always seemed an utterly cockamamy feature
to me, and I've never understood what actually motivated it.
Does a parent death signal make most sense between processes that are part of
On 4/10/07, Roland McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does a parent death signal make most sense between separately written
programs?
I don't think it does. It has always seemed an utterly cockamamy feature
to me, and I've never understood what actually motivated it.
It's useful, but the
10 matches
Mail list logo