On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:19:47 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 22:30:53 +0800 kbuild test robot wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > [auto build test WARNING on pm/linux-next]
> > [also build test WARNING on v4.7-rc7 next-20160722]
> > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git
Dear all,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 22:30:53 +0800 kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [auto build test WARNING on pm/linux-next]
> [also build test WARNING on v4.7-rc7 next-20160722]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
> help improve the system]
>
> url:
>
Dear Viresh,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:21:51 -0700 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22-07-16, 20:42, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > static int _set_opp_voltage(struct device *dev, struct regulator *reg,
> > unsigned long u_volt, unsigned long u_volt_min,
> > unsig
On 22-07-16, 20:42, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> static int _set_opp_voltage(struct device *dev, struct regulator *reg,
> unsigned long u_volt, unsigned long u_volt_min,
> unsigned long u_volt_max)
> @@ -586,9 +565,24 @@ int dev_pm_opp_set_rate(struct
Hi,
[auto build test WARNING on pm/linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.7-rc7 next-20160722]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jisheng-Zhang/PM-OPP-optimize-dev_pm_opp_set_rat
In dev_pm_opp_set_rate(), _find_opp_table() is called three times: once
by _get_opp_clk(), twice by dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(). If there are
several opp_tables in the system, three times of opp table finding is a
big waste. This patch reduced the call of _find_opp_table() to only
once.
Signed-off
6 matches
Mail list logo
