On 2007.05.16 19:38:18 +0300, Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 11:05:34PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
> > > Since everyone else is doing it, why not me as well. Looks like I had
> > > a nice retro 7-bit a-umlaut in the tree from ten years ago too!
>
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 07:38:18PM +0300, Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
> Since I'm polluting the list already, might as well take the opportunity
> to resubmit :)
Blah, I think it now thought the UTF-8 in the patch was actually
latin-1 and then helpfully re-encoded into UTF-8.
I give up :-(
-
To
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 11:05:34PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
> > Since everyone else is doing it, why not me as well. Looks like I had
> > a nice retro 7-bit a-umlaut in the tree from ten years ago too!
> > (That was back when ISO 8859-1 didn't work universally...).
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On May 15 2007 23:05, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
>>> Since everyone else is doing it, why not me as well. Looks like I had
>>> a nice retro 7-bit a-umlaut in the tree from ten years ago too!
>>> (That was back when ISO 8859-1 didn't work
On May 15 2007 23:05, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
>> Since everyone else is doing it, why not me as well. Looks like I had
>> a nice retro 7-bit a-umlaut in the tree from ten years ago too!
>> (That was back when ISO 8859-1 didn't work universally...).
>> I hope my mailer is
Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
> Since everyone else is doing it, why not me as well. Looks like I had
> a nice retro 7-bit a-umlaut in the tree from ten years ago too!
> (That was back when ISO 8859-1 didn't work universally...).
> I hope my mailer is setup correctly for this,
>
Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
Since everyone else is doing it, why not me as well. Looks like I had
a nice retro 7-bit a-umlaut in the tree from ten years ago too!
(That was back when ISO 8859-1 didn't work universally...).
I hope my mailer is setup correctly for this,
On May 15 2007 23:05, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
Since everyone else is doing it, why not me as well. Looks like I had
a nice retro 7-bit a-umlaut in the tree from ten years ago too!
(That was back when ISO 8859-1 didn't work universally...).
I hope my mailer is setup
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On May 15 2007 23:05, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
Since everyone else is doing it, why not me as well. Looks like I had
a nice retro 7-bit a-umlaut in the tree from ten years ago too!
(That was back when ISO 8859-1 didn't work universally...).
I hope
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 11:05:34PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
Since everyone else is doing it, why not me as well. Looks like I had
a nice retro 7-bit a-umlaut in the tree from ten years ago too!
(That was back when ISO 8859-1 didn't work universally...).
I
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 07:38:18PM +0300, Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
Since I'm polluting the list already, might as well take the opportunity
to resubmit :)
Blah, I think it now thought the UTF-8 in the patch was actually
latin-1 and then helpfully re-encoded into UTF-8.
I give up :-(
-
To
On 2007.05.16 19:38:18 +0300, Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 11:05:34PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
Since everyone else is doing it, why not me as well. Looks like I had
a nice retro 7-bit a-umlaut in the tree from ten years ago too!
(That
Since everyone else is doing it, why not me as well. Looks like I had
a nice retro 7-bit a-umlaut in the tree from ten years ago too!
(That was back when ISO 8859-1 didn't work universally...).
I hope my mailer is setup correctly for this,
http://www.ee.oulu.fi/~pp/pp-goes-utf8.patch has the
Since everyone else is doing it, why not me as well. Looks like I had
a nice retro 7-bit a-umlaut in the tree from ten years ago too!
(That was back when ISO 8859-1 didn't work universally...).
I hope my mailer is setup correctly for this,
http://www.ee.oulu.fi/~pp/pp-goes-utf8.patch has the
14 matches
Mail list logo
