Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMODEL_MEDLOW)

2019-03-29 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Fri, 08 Mar 2019 06:53:02 PST (-0800), Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 03:56:34PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: IS_ENABLED should generally use CONFIG_ prefaced symbols and it doesn't appear as if there is a CMODEL_MEDLOW define. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches Looks good,

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMODEL_MEDLOW)

2019-03-08 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 03:56:34PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > IS_ENABLED should generally use CONFIG_ prefaced symbols and > it doesn't appear as if there is a CMODEL_MEDLOW define. > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig

[PATCH] RISC-V: Use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMODEL_MEDLOW)

2019-03-07 Thread Joe Perches
IS_ENABLED should generally use CONFIG_ prefaced symbols and it doesn't appear as if there is a CMODEL_MEDLOW define. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches --- arch/riscv/kernel/module.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c