On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:25:23AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 01:26:26PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Actually, spi_master_put() after spi_alloc_master() must _not_ be followed
> > by kfree(). The memory is already freed with the call to spi_master_put()
> > through
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 01:26:26PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Actually, spi_master_put() after spi_alloc_master() must _not_ be followed
> by kfree(). The memory is already freed with the call to spi_master_put()
> through spi_master_class, which registers a release function. Calling both
> spi_
Actually, spi_master_put() after spi_alloc_master() must _not_ be followed
by kfree(). The memory is already freed with the call to spi_master_put()
through spi_master_class, which registers a release function. Calling both
spi_master_put() and kfree() results in often nasty (and delayed) crashes
e
3 matches
Mail list logo