On Nov 7, 2006 1:55 AM, Peer Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Modified and resent out the patch as attachment.
> Description about the patch:
> Add SGPIO support in sata_nv.c.
> SGPIO (Serial General Purpose Input Output) is a sideband serial 4-wire
> interface that a storage controller uses to
On Nov 7, 2006 1:55 AM, Peer Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified and resent out the patch as attachment.
Description about the patch:
Add SGPIO support in sata_nv.c.
SGPIO (Serial General Purpose Input Output) is a sideband serial 4-wire
interface that a storage controller uses to
gt; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; Kuan Luo
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Add the SGPIO support for sata_nv.c
>
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:04:30 -0500
> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Peer Chen wrote:
> > > I didn't get any c
: Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Add the SGPIO support for sata_nv.c
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:04:30 -0500
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peer Chen wrote:
> > I didn't get any comment from you guys for new patch, does someone
take
> > care this patch, do we still need some modificat
: Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Add the SGPIO support for sata_nv.c
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:04:30 -0500
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peer Chen wrote:
I didn't get any comment from you guys for new patch, does someone
take
care this patch, do we still need some modification upon it? Or do
we
need
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristen Carlson
Accardi
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 15:22
To: Jeff Garzik
Cc: Peer Chen; Christoph Hellwig; Prakash Punnoor; Andrew Morton;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; Kuan Luo
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Add the SGPIO support
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:04:30 -0500
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peer Chen wrote:
> > I didn't get any comment from you guys for new patch, does someone take
> > care this patch, do we still need some modification upon it? Or do we
> > need re-submit it in other thread?
>
> For my
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:04:30 -0500
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peer Chen wrote:
I didn't get any comment from you guys for new patch, does someone take
care this patch, do we still need some modification upon it? Or do we
need re-submit it in other thread?
For my part, it's in
Since I've been the one making the most changes in sata_nv lately I
figured I would make some more comments on this patch:
Subject:
RE: [PATCH] SCSI: Add the SGPIO support for sata_nv.c
From:
"Peer Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Nov 2006 17:55:11 +0800
To:
"Chris
Since I've been the one making the most changes in sata_nv lately I
figured I would make some more comments on this patch:
Subject:
RE: [PATCH] SCSI: Add the SGPIO support for sata_nv.c
From:
Peer Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Tue, 7 Nov 2006 17:55:11 +0800
To:
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED
Peer Chen wrote:
I didn't get any comment from you guys for new patch, does someone take
care this patch, do we still need some modification upon it? Or do we
need re-submit it in other thread?
For my part, it's in my queue of things to review. I need to figure out
the best way to export
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 04:36:37PM +0800, Peer Chen wrote:
> I didn't get any comment from you guys for new patch, does someone take
> care this patch, do we still need some modification upon it? Or do we
> need re-submit it in other thread?
One small change suggestion:
> +static inline bool
Hellwig'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; Kuan Luo
Subject: RE: [PATCH] SCSI: Add the SGPIO support for sata_nv.c
Modified and resent out the patch as attachment.
Description about the patch:
Add SGPIO support in sata_nv.c.
SGPIO (Serial General Purpose
Hellwig'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; Kuan Luo
Subject: RE: [PATCH] SCSI: Add the SGPIO support for sata_nv.c
Modified and resent out the patch as attachment.
Description about the patch:
Add SGPIO support in sata_nv.c.
SGPIO (Serial General Purpose
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 04:36:37PM +0800, Peer Chen wrote:
I didn't get any comment from you guys for new patch, does someone take
care this patch, do we still need some modification upon it? Or do we
need re-submit it in other thread?
One small change suggestion:
+static inline bool
Peer Chen wrote:
I didn't get any comment from you guys for new patch, does someone take
care this patch, do we still need some modification upon it? Or do we
need re-submit it in other thread?
For my part, it's in my queue of things to review. I need to figure out
the best way to export
16 matches
Mail list logo
