On Wednesday 23 February 2005 05:00, Matt Mackall wrote:
> It's disappointing that this paper appears to be available only
> through subscription sources. If I'm mistaken, please post a URL.
>
The authors are making a webpage with info and documentation.
I suppose that article you are
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:42:19 -0800
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Probably the best long term solution is to make the protocol choice
> be a property of the destination cache
[..]
> The protocol choices are mutually exclusive, if you walk through the code
> (or do experiments),
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:42:19 -0800
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably the best long term solution is to make the protocol choice
be a property of the destination cache
[..]
The protocol choices are mutually exclusive, if you walk through the code
(or do experiments), you
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 05:00, Matt Mackall wrote:
It's disappointing that this paper appears to be available only
through subscription sources. If I'm mistaken, please post a URL.
The authors are making a webpage with info and documentation.
I suppose that article you are referring
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:14:47 -0800, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:03:11 -0500 (EST)
John Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An idea I've been toying with for a while now is completely abstracting
> congestion control. Then you could have congestion control
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:34:42PM +0100, Daniele Lacamera wrote:
> Hi
> This is the official patch to implement TCP Hybla congestion avoidance.
>
> - "In heterogeneous networks, TCP connections that incorporate a
> terrestrial or satellite radio link are greatly disadvantaged with
> respect to
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:14:47 -0800, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:03:11 -0500 (EST)
> John Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > An idea I've been toying with for a while now is completely abstracting
> > congestion control. Then you could have congestion
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:34:42 +0100
Daniele Lacamera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One last note: IMHO we really need a better way to select congestion
avoidance scheme between those available, instead of switching each one
on and off. I.e., we can't say how vegas and
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:42:19 -0800
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The protocol choices are mutually exclusive, if you walk through the code
> (or do experiments), you find that that only one gets used. As part of the
> longer term plan, I would like to:
> - have one sysctl
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:03:11 -0500 (EST)
John Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An idea I've been toying with for a while now is completely abstracting
> congestion control. Then you could have congestion control loadable
> modules, which would avoid this mess of experimental algorithms
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:34:42 +0100
> Daniele Lacamera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > One last note: IMHO we really need a better way to select congestion
> > avoidance scheme between those available, instead of switching each one
> > on and off.
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:34:42 +0100
Daniele Lacamera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> This is the official patch to implement TCP Hybla congestion avoidance.
>
> - "In heterogeneous networks, TCP connections that incorporate a
> terrestrial or satellite radio link are greatly disadvantaged with
On Tuesday 22 February 2005 15:34, Daniele Lacamera wrote:
> Hi
> This is the official patch to implement TCP Hybla congestion
avoidance.
I've post a wrong/unclean patch. Here's the right one.
Sorry.
--
Daniele Lacamera
root at danielinux.net
diff -ruN
Hi
This is the official patch to implement TCP Hybla congestion avoidance.
- "In heterogeneous networks, TCP connections that incorporate a
terrestrial or satellite radio link are greatly disadvantaged with
respect to entirely wired connections, because of their longer round
trip times (RTTs).
Hi
This is the official patch to implement TCP Hybla congestion avoidance.
- In heterogeneous networks, TCP connections that incorporate a
terrestrial or satellite radio link are greatly disadvantaged with
respect to entirely wired connections, because of their longer round
trip times (RTTs).
On Tuesday 22 February 2005 15:34, Daniele Lacamera wrote:
Hi
This is the official patch to implement TCP Hybla congestion
avoidance.
I've post a wrong/unclean patch. Here's the right one.
Sorry.
--
Daniele Lacamera
root at danielinux.net
diff -ruN
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:34:42 +0100
Daniele Lacamera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
This is the official patch to implement TCP Hybla congestion avoidance.
- In heterogeneous networks, TCP connections that incorporate a
terrestrial or satellite radio link are greatly disadvantaged with
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:34:42 +0100
Daniele Lacamera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One last note: IMHO we really need a better way to select congestion
avoidance scheme between those available, instead of switching each one
on and off. I.e., we
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:03:11 -0500 (EST)
John Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An idea I've been toying with for a while now is completely abstracting
congestion control. Then you could have congestion control loadable
modules, which would avoid this mess of experimental algorithms inside the
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:42:19 -0800
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The protocol choices are mutually exclusive, if you walk through the code
(or do experiments), you find that that only one gets used. As part of the
longer term plan, I would like to:
- have one sysctl
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:34:42 +0100
Daniele Lacamera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One last note: IMHO we really need a better way to select congestion
avoidance scheme between those available, instead of switching each one
on and off. I.e., we can't say how vegas and westwood
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:14:47 -0800, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:03:11 -0500 (EST)
John Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An idea I've been toying with for a while now is completely abstracting
congestion control. Then you could have congestion control
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:34:42PM +0100, Daniele Lacamera wrote:
Hi
This is the official patch to implement TCP Hybla congestion avoidance.
- In heterogeneous networks, TCP connections that incorporate a
terrestrial or satellite radio link are greatly disadvantaged with
respect to
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:14:47 -0800, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:03:11 -0500 (EST)
John Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An idea I've been toying with for a while now is completely abstracting
congestion control. Then you could have congestion control
24 matches
Mail list logo
