Re: [PATCH] UML - forgot asm-um/cmpxchg.h

On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:09:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > OK, I clumped all three patches into one as I think that's required for > git-bisect friendliness. OK - I separated the i386 and x86_64 bits to make it easy to drop the x86_64 part. Plus, I think it doesn't make any difference -

Re: [PATCH] UML - forgot asm-um/cmpxchg.h

On Tue, 1 May 2007 15:36:46 -0400 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The i386 and x86_64 cmpxchg patches require an asm-um/cmpxchg.h for > the UML build. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- > include/asm-um/cmpxchg.h |6 ++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > >

Re: [PATCH] UML - forgot asm-um/cmpxchg.h

On Tue, 1 May 2007 15:36:46 -0400 Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The i386 and x86_64 cmpxchg patches require an asm-um/cmpxchg.h for the UML build. Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- include/asm-um/cmpxchg.h |6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) Index:

Re: [PATCH] UML - forgot asm-um/cmpxchg.h

On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:09:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: OK, I clumped all three patches into one as I think that's required for git-bisect friendliness. OK - I separated the i386 and x86_64 bits to make it easy to drop the x86_64 part. Plus, I think it doesn't make any difference - the

[PATCH] UML - forgot asm-um/cmpxchg.h

The i386 and x86_64 cmpxchg patches require an asm-um/cmpxchg.h for the UML build. Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- include/asm-um/cmpxchg.h |6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) Index: linux-2.6.21-mm/include/asm-um/cmpxchg.h

[PATCH] UML - forgot asm-um/cmpxchg.h

The i386 and x86_64 cmpxchg patches require an asm-um/cmpxchg.h for the UML build. Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- include/asm-um/cmpxchg.h |6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) Index: linux-2.6.21-mm/include/asm-um/cmpxchg.h