> > From: liu chuansheng
> > Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
>
> Why is this in the patch?
>
> Please resend it in a format that I do not have to manually edit the patch.
>
> greg k-h
Thanks your teaching, resend again.
Because
t; From: liu chuansheng
> Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
Why is this in the patch?
Please resend it in a format that I do not have to manually edit the
patch.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> This patch is corrupted and can not be applied at all. Please fix your email
> client and try again.
>
> greg k-h
I am very sorry to waste your time, resend it again.
From: liu chuansheng
Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
Because the IRQF_DISABLED
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 09:39:56AM +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> From: liu chuansheng
> Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
Don't include the Subject: in the patch body again, that is pointless
and requires me to hand-edit the file.
> Because the IRQF
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 09:39:56AM +, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
From: liu chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
Don't include the Subject: in the patch body again, that is pointless
and requires me to hand-edit the file.
Because
This patch is corrupted and can not be applied at all. Please fix your email
client and try again.
greg k-h
I am very sorry to waste your time, resend it again.
From: liu chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
Because
Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
Why is this in the patch?
Please resend it in a format that I do not have to manually edit the
patch.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
From: liu chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
Why is this in the patch?
Please resend it in a format that I do not have to manually edit the patch.
greg k-h
Thanks your teaching, resend again.
Because the IRQF_DISABLED
On Sat, 1 Sep 2012, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> From: liu chuansheng
> Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
>
> Because the IRQF_DISABLED as the flag is now a NOOP and has been
> deprecated and in hardirq context the interrupt is disabled.
>
>
On Sat, 1 Sep 2012, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
From: liu chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
Because the IRQF_DISABLED as the flag is now a NOOP and has been
deprecated and in hardirq context the interrupt is disabled.
so
From: liu chuansheng
Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
Because the IRQF_DISABLED as the flag is now a NOOP and has been
deprecated and in hardirq context the interrupt is disabled.
so in usb/host code:
Removing the usage of flag IRQF_DISABLED;
Removing the calling
From: liu chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] USB/host: Cleanup unneccessary irq disable code
Because the IRQF_DISABLED as the flag is now a NOOP and has been
deprecated and in hardirq context the interrupt is disabled.
so in usb/host code:
Removing the usage of flag
12 matches
Mail list logo
