On 5 Dec 2014 19:07:59 -0500 "George Spelvin" wrote:
> It is possible to include and try to use
> VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS, then puke because BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO
> isn't defined.
>
> I hit this via:
>
> #include
> module_param(verbose, bool, 0);
>
> IMHO, except in documented special cases,
On 12/05/14 16:07, George Spelvin wrote:
> It is possible to include and try to use
> VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS, then puke because BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO
> isn't defined.
>
> I hit this via:
>
> #include
> module_param(verbose, bool, 0);
>
> IMHO, except in documented special cases, header files
It is possible to include and try to use
VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS, then puke because BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO
isn't defined.
I hit this via:
#include
module_param(verbose, bool, 0);
IMHO, except in documented special cases, header files should
#include their own macros' dependencies.
Signed-off-by:
It is possible to include linux/kernel.h and try to use
VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS, then puke because BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO
isn't defined.
I hit this via:
#include linux/moduleparam.h
module_param(verbose, bool, 0);
IMHO, except in documented special cases, header files should
#include their own
On 12/05/14 16:07, George Spelvin wrote:
It is possible to include linux/kernel.h and try to use
VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS, then puke because BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO
isn't defined.
I hit this via:
#include linux/moduleparam.h
module_param(verbose, bool, 0);
IMHO, except in documented special
On 5 Dec 2014 19:07:59 -0500 George Spelvin li...@horizon.com wrote:
It is possible to include linux/kernel.h and try to use
VERIFY_OCTAL_PERMISSIONS, then puke because BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO
isn't defined.
I hit this via:
#include linux/moduleparam.h
module_param(verbose, bool, 0);
IMHO,
6 matches
Mail list logo