On 07/18/2012 06:23 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
On 19 July 2012 07:23, John Stultz wrote:
Actually, this change opens up a bunch of other races, as any caller of
alarmtimer_get_rtcdev() could have the rtcdevice removed under it.
We'll need to have proper reference counting w/ get/put calls, probably
On 19 July 2012 07:23, John Stultz wrote:
> Actually, this change opens up a bunch of other races, as any caller of
> alarmtimer_get_rtcdev() could have the rtcdevice removed under it.
>
> We'll need to have proper reference counting w/ get/put calls, probably also
> adding a alarmtimer_put_rtcdev
On 07/18/2012 04:16 PM, John Stultz wrote:
On 07/04/2012 09:13 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
The following is a test sequence that installs a rtc module, remove it
and installs it again.
$ insmod rtc-snvs.ko
snvs_rtc 20cc034.snvs-rtc-lp: rtc core: registered
20cc034.snvs-rtc-lp as rtc0
$ hwclock
Thu J
On 07/04/2012 09:13 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
The following is a test sequence that installs a rtc module, remove it
and installs it again.
$ insmod rtc-snvs.ko
snvs_rtc 20cc034.snvs-rtc-lp: rtc core: registered 20cc034.snvs-rtc-lp as rtc0
$ hwclock
Thu Jul 5 08:53:35 2012 0.00 seconds
$ rmmod
On 07/10/2012 08:46 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
Hi John,
Is this patch a valid fix or just a noise?
Sorry! This is on my list, but I've not had a chance to get to it.
I'll try to get a closer look later this week!
Thanks for reminding me, and sorry again!
-john
Regards,
Shawn
On Thu, Jul 05, 20
Hi John,
Is this patch a valid fix or just a noise?
Regards,
Shawn
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:13:07AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> The following is a test sequence that installs a rtc module, remove it
> and installs it again.
>
> $ insmod rtc-snvs.ko
> snvs_rtc 20cc034.snvs-rtc-lp: rtc core: regi
6 matches
Mail list logo