On 2018/8/13 20:28, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi zhong jiang,
>
> On 08/10/2018 05:40 AM, zhong jiang wrote:
>> kmemdup is better than kmalloc() + memcpy(), and we do not like
>> open code. So just use kmemdup instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c | 7
On 2018/8/13 20:28, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi zhong jiang,
>
> On 08/10/2018 05:40 AM, zhong jiang wrote:
>> kmemdup is better than kmalloc() + memcpy(), and we do not like
>> open code. So just use kmemdup instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c | 7
Hi zhong jiang,
On 08/10/2018 05:40 AM, zhong jiang wrote:
> kmemdup is better than kmalloc() + memcpy(), and we do not like
> open code. So just use kmemdup instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c | 7 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5
Hi zhong jiang,
On 08/10/2018 05:40 AM, zhong jiang wrote:
> kmemdup is better than kmalloc() + memcpy(), and we do not like
> open code. So just use kmemdup instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c | 7 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5
kmemdup is better than kmalloc() + memcpy(), and we do not like
open code. So just use kmemdup instead.
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang
---
arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c
kmemdup is better than kmalloc() + memcpy(), and we do not like
open code. So just use kmemdup instead.
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang
---
arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/pm.c
6 matches
Mail list logo