On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:52:09PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
> > ---
> > include/linux/audit.h |2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Merged into audit/next, thanks!
>
Thanks, Paul.
--
Gustavo
On 2020-05-07 17:49, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 05:58:13PM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On 2020-05-07 13:50, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> > > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:46 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
>
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 6:45 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
wrote:
> I wouldn't advise to make any of these conversions in include/uapi/ ...
Yes, let's not make changes like this to anything under include/uapi;
the potential reward doesn't outweigh the risks.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 05:58:13PM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 2020-05-07 13:50, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> > variable-length types such as
On 2020-05-07 13:50, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
>
> struct
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By
7 matches
Mail list logo
