On 14/11/05, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On 14/11/04, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >> From: Miklos Szeredi
> >
> > Hi Miklos,
> >
> >> Audit rules disappear when an inode they watch is evicted from the cache.
> >> This is likely not what we wan
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi
>
> Audit rules disappear when an inode they watch is evicted from the cache.
> This is likely not what we want.
>
> The guilty commit is "fsnotify: allow marks to not pin inodes in core",
> which didn't take into accoun
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 14/11/04, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> From: Miklos Szeredi
>
> Hi Miklos,
>
>> Audit rules disappear when an inode they watch is evicted from the cache.
>> This is likely not what we want.
>>
>> The guilty commit is "fsnotify: allow mark
On 14/11/04, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi
Hi Miklos,
> Audit rules disappear when an inode they watch is evicted from the cache.
> This is likely not what we want.
>
> The guilty commit is "fsnotify: allow marks to not pin inodes in core",
> which didn't take into account that a
[adding paul and richard]
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 11:27 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi
>
> Audit rules disappear when an inode they watch is evicted from the cache.
> This is likely not what we want.
>
> The guilty commit is "fsnotify: allow marks to not pin inodes in core",
From: Miklos Szeredi
Audit rules disappear when an inode they watch is evicted from the cache.
This is likely not what we want.
The guilty commit is "fsnotify: allow marks to not pin inodes in core",
which didn't take into account that audit_tree adds watches with a zero
mask.
Adding any mask s
6 matches
Mail list logo