On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:13:59AM +0200, Robin van der Gracht wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:42:08 -0700
> Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > The data read from the device is 3 little-endian words, so let's annotate
> > them as such and use le16_to_cpu() to convert them to
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:13:59AM +0200, Robin van der Gracht wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:42:08 -0700
> Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > The data read from the device is 3 little-endian words, so let's annotate
> > them as such and use le16_to_cpu() to convert them to host endianness - it
> >
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:42:08 -0700
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> The data read from the device is 3 little-endian words, so let's annotate
> them as such and use le16_to_cpu() to convert them to host endianness - it
> might turn out to be a bit more performant, and it
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:42:08 -0700
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> The data read from the device is 3 little-endian words, so let's annotate
> them as such and use le16_to_cpu() to convert them to host endianness - it
> might turn out to be a bit more performant, and it expresses the conversion
> more
The data read from the device is 3 little-endian words, so let's annotate
them as such and use le16_to_cpu() to convert them to host endianness - it
might turn out to be a bit more performant, and it expresses the conversion
more clearly.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
The data read from the device is 3 little-endian words, so let's annotate
them as such and use le16_to_cpu() to convert them to host endianness - it
might turn out to be a bit more performant, and it expresses the conversion
more clearly.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
6 matches
Mail list logo