Re: [PATCH] biarch compiler support for i386

Christoph Hellwig wrote: Given that the same logic applies to various other ports maybe it should go into a common Makefile fragment? Alas, the *details* are different for each architecture. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Re: [PATCH] biarch compiler support for i386

On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:14:16PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > This allows the i386 architecture to be built on a system with a biarch > compiler that defaults to x86-64, merely by specifying ARCH=i386. > > As previously discussed, this uses the equivalent logic to the ppc port. Given that

[PATCH] biarch compiler support for i386

This allows the i386 architecture to be built on a system with a biarch compiler that defaults to x86-64, merely by specifying ARCH=i386. As previously discussed, this uses the equivalent logic to the ppc port. -hpa Signed-Off-By: H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index:

[PATCH] biarch compiler support for i386

This allows the i386 architecture to be built on a system with a biarch compiler that defaults to x86-64, merely by specifying ARCH=i386. As previously discussed, this uses the equivalent logic to the ppc port. -hpa Signed-Off-By: H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index:

Re: [PATCH] biarch compiler support for i386

On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:14:16PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: This allows the i386 architecture to be built on a system with a biarch compiler that defaults to x86-64, merely by specifying ARCH=i386. As previously discussed, this uses the equivalent logic to the ppc port. Given that the

Re: [PATCH] biarch compiler support for i386

Christoph Hellwig wrote: Given that the same logic applies to various other ports maybe it should go into a common Makefile fragment? Alas, the *details* are different for each architecture. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a