On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Steven Miao wrote:
>
>> > This doesn't seem to be present in linux-next as of today, so I am picking
>> > it up.
>> It seems it's still in today's linux-next?
>>
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Jiri Kosina jkos...@suse.cz wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Steven Miao wrote:
This doesn't seem to be present in linux-next as of today, so I am picking
it up.
It seems it's still in today's linux-next?
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Steven Miao wrote:
> > This doesn't seem to be present in linux-next as of today, so I am picking
> > it up.
> It seems it's still in today's linux-next?
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/blackfin/mach-common/ints-priority.c#n432
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Steven Miao wrote:
This doesn't seem to be present in linux-next as of today, so I am picking
it up.
It seems it's still in today's linux-next?
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/blackfin/mach-common/ints-priority.c#n432
Your
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jan 2015, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
>
>> Remove the function bfin_sec_resume() that is not used anywhere.
>>
>> This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called
>> cppcheck.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rickard
Hi Rickard,
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Rickard Strandqvist
wrote:
> Remove the function bfin_sec_resume() that is not used anywhere.
>
> This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called
> cppcheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
> ---
>
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> Remove the function bfin_sec_resume() that is not used anywhere.
>
> This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called
> cppcheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
This doesn't seem to be present in linux-next as of
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
Remove the function bfin_sec_resume() that is not used anywhere.
This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called
cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se
This doesn't seem
Hi Rickard,
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Rickard Strandqvist
rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se wrote:
Remove the function bfin_sec_resume() that is not used anywhere.
This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called
cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Jiri Kosina jkos...@suse.cz wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
Remove the function bfin_sec_resume() that is not used anywhere.
This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called
cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard
Remove the function bfin_sec_resume() that is not used anywhere.
This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called
cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
---
arch/blackfin/mach-common/ints-priority.c |8
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
Remove the function bfin_sec_resume() that is not used anywhere.
This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called
cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se
---
arch/blackfin/mach-common/ints-priority.c |8
1 file
12 matches
Mail list logo
